Vural Özkan, Gülşah

Profile Picture
Profile URL
https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/12093
Name Variants
Job Title
Dr.Öğrt.Gör.
Email Address
Main Affiliation
01.01.05.03. Psikoloji Bölümü
Status
Former Staff
Website
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
60378812600
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
whHNdwkAAAAJ
WoS Researcher ID
PKT-0972-2026

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available
Documents

1

Citations

0

h-index

0

Go to Scopus profile
Documents

1

Citations

0

Go to WoS profile
Scholarly Output

1

Articles

1

Views / Downloads

0/0

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

0

Scopus Citation Count

0

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

0.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

0.00

Open Access Source

0

Supervised Theses

0

JournalCount
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Quartile distribution chart data is not available

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Filters

20261
Reset filters

Settings

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Rethinking Job Demands–Resources-Based Interventions for Evolving Work Environments: A Problematizing Review
    (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 2026) Vural Özkan, Gülşah; Yavuz Serçekman, Meltem; Ayaz, Özlem; Kilic Hawarneh, Ozge
    PurposeThe Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) theory is widely used for workplace interventions targeting well-being, satisfaction and burnout reduction. However, shifting work contexts raise questions about the adaptability of its core constructs. This paper aims to critically examine how JD-R theory has been applied in intervention design, with particular attention to the assumptions that may limit responsiveness across diverse organizational and cultural settings.Design/methodology/approachAdopting a problematization review approach, we analyze 109 studies that employ the JD-R theory in the design of workplace interventions. Our review identifies underlying assumptions, conceptual tensions and the ways in which demands and resources have been interpreted across different contexts, roles and cultures.FindingsThe review reveals that JD-R constructs are often treated as stable and universally applicable, thereby constraining adaptability. We highlight overlooked assumptions and tensions, proposing a taxonomy of interventions that emphasizes contextual sensitivity, design flexibility and cross-level integration.Practical implicationsThe proposed taxonomy offers organizations a framework for developing workplace interventions that better align with diverse employee needs and evolving work environments.Social implicationsBy promoting more sustainable and responsive workplace interventions, this study supports healthier and more equitable organizational practices, with potential benefits for employee well-being across diverse cultural and occupational contexts.Originality/valueThis paper applies problematization review to JD-R interventions, offering a novel critique that highlights contextual variation and adaptability, while providing a practical taxonomy for future applications.