Issues in the planning and design of university campuses in Turkey

dc.contributor.author Berna YAYLALI
dc.contributor.author Ela CIL
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-22T16:05:29Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.description.abstract Universities have crucial importance in producing and transmitting knowledge and formulating an effective and critical public sphere that meets the public with the university population. Their spatial characteristics of universities also refer to an important position within the urban fabric: with dense students’ and academicians’ population they occupy a considerable amount of spaces in cities. Their spatial formations change over time as new buildings are added and student numbers increased. In that respect this article seeks to explore how the spatial configurations of university campuses have evolved over time in Turkey. In order to explore the changes in spatial layout of university campuses especially the organization of public spaces and their relations with the campus buildings we have narrowed our focus through a chronological reading. Two methods of collecting data are used: First we reviewed design articles about university campuses in architectural periodicals and online architecture databases. Second the Five Year Development Plans of Turkish State Planning Organization (DPT 5 Yıllık Planları) have been examined to follow the governmental considerations. In addition we made interviews with some of the architects who took part in the campus planning process of the cases that are selected for this article. In conclusion analysis of the spatial configuration of campuses in Turkey reveals some unexpected insights about particular design approaches of universities. The analysis of specific campuses in chronological order shows that it is possible to trace specific campus design tendencies that are peculiar to specific periods.
dc.identifier.citation Ankara’da Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi (1965) Arkitekt 3(320) 108-114Bilgin A. (2006). Doğu Akdeniz Bölgesi ve Çevresinde Üniversite Kampüs Planlaması Üzerine Bir İnceleme (master’s thesis). Cukurova University Adana.Brockliss L. (2000). Gown and Town: The University and the City in Europe 1200-2000. Minerva 38 147- 170.Christiaanse K. (2007). “Campus to City: Urban Design for Universities”. In Campus and the City: Urban Design for Knowledge Society Zurich: gta VerlagCoulson J. Paul R. and Isabelle T. (2010). University Planning and Architecture: The Search for Perfection. New York: Routledge.Çinici A. and B. Çinici. (1965) Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi. Mimarlık 15(1) 18-22.Davis M and T. Davis. (1990) An Urban Design Proposal for the University of Miami Campus Master Plan. Competition Journal of Architectural Education 43(4) 8–15.Deplazes A. (2007). The Campus as Location and Strategy: Thumbnail Sketches of Science City. Campus and the City: Urban Design for Knowledge Society 35-43 ed. by Kees Christiaanse. Zurich: gta Verlag.Diyarbakır Üniversitesi Kampüs Planlama Yarışmasında 1. Ödülü Kazananlar. (1971). Arkitekt 342 67-77Dölen E. (2010). Türkiye Üniversite Tarihi: Özerk Üniversite Dönemi 1946-1981. İstanbul : Bilgi Üniversitesi YayınlarıEge Üniversitesi Şehircilik Proje Müsabakası Jüri Raporu Özeti. (1959). Arkitekt 3(256) 101-109.Erkman U. (1990). Büyüme ve Gelişme Açısından Üniversite Kampüslerinde Planlama ve Tasarım Sorunları. İstanbul: İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi.Erkovan E. 2013. “Evrensel Tasarım İlkeleri Kapsamında Bir Kamusal Alan Olarak Akdeniz Üniversitesi Kampüsünün İncelenmesi.” (Master’s thesis). Bahçeşehir University İstanbul. Giliberti M. (2011). The Campus in the Twentieth Century: The Urban Campus in Chicago from 1890 to 1965.Urbani Izziv 22(2) 77–85. Hashimhony R. and J. Haina. (2006). Designing the University of Future. Planning for Higher Education (3) 5–19.Hatiboğlu T. M. (1998). Türkiye Üniversite Tarihi. Ankara: Selvi Yayınevi.Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi (1965). Mimarlık (15) 31-32.Kayın E. and F. Özbakan. (2013). İzmir Kent Ansiklopedisi-Mimarlık V. 2. İzmir: İBB.Kortan E. (1981) Çağdaş Üniversite Kampüsleri Tasarımı METU Press AnkaraLarkham P. (2000). Institutions and Urban Form: the Example of Universities. Urban Morphology 4(2)63-77.Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi (1967) Mimarlık Journal 43 V.5Perry D. and W Wiewel. (2005). The University as Urban Developer: Case Studies and Analysis. Cambridge Mass : Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Sargın G. A. and A Savaş. (2013).A University is a Society: an Environmental History of the METU Campus. The Journal of Architecture 18(1) 79- 106.Sargın S. (2007). Türkiye’de Üniversitelerin Gelişim Süreci ve Bölgesel Dağılımı. SDÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 3(5) 133-150.Şimşek H. (2007). “Turkey” In International Handbook of Higher Education eds. by James Forest and Philip Altbach 1003-1018. Dordrecht: Springer.Tekeli İ. (2010). Tarihsel Bağlamı İçinde Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimin ve YÖK’ün Tarihi. Ankara: Tarih Vakfı Yayınları.Toprak M. (2012). Mekansal Planlama Politikalari ve Kentlerin Sosyo- Ekonomik Durumu Işığında Kentleşme Süreci. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi 21(2)1-23.Turner P. V. (1987). Campus: An American Planning Tradition. Cambridge Massachusetts and London: MIT PressTüreyen M. (2003). Yükseköğretim Kurumları- Kampüsler. İstanbul: Tasarım Yayın Grubu.
dc.identifier.doi 10.5505/itujfa.2020.03789
dc.identifier.issn 2564-7474
dc.identifier.issn 2564-7474
dc.identifier.issn 1302-8324
dc.identifier.uri https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/10640
dc.language.iso İngilizce
dc.relation.ispartof A/Z : ITU journal of Faculty of Architecture
dc.source A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi
dc.subject Mimarlık-Eğitim- Eğitim Araştırmaları-İnşaat Mühendisliği-İnşaat ve Yapı Teknolojisi
dc.title Issues in the planning and design of university campuses in Turkey
dc.type Article
dc.type Article
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.identifier.openalex W4236660365
gdc.index.type TR-Dizin
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.3811355E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 1.276467E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.4632
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.78
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 16
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 2
oaire.citation.endPage 114
oaire.citation.startPage 99
publicationissue.issueNumber 1
publicationvolume.volumeNumber 18
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37

Files