Optimizing fused deposition modelling parameters based on the design for additive manufacturing to enhance product sustainability

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2023

Authors

Sachin Kumar Kumar Mangla
Yigit Kazancoglu
Muruvvet Deniz Sezer
Neslihan Top
Ismail Şahin

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier B.V.

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 1%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 1%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Nowadays designers and engineers rely on specific manufacturing guidelines to bring quality products to market with minimum time and error. Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) is one of these guides adapted to Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies used to increase the operational performance of components minimise material waste and provide design flexibility. DfAM optimises three-dimensional (3D) printing parameters to maximise the potential of AM technologies. DfAM improves ecological performance and provides many advantages for the transition to a circular economy by providing resource efficiency and enabling the production of parts with reduced weight without changing their mechanical strength. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the infill density infill pattern and layer thickness on the printing time weight Young's modulus compressive stress surface roughness tensile strength CO<inf>2</inf> emissions and amount of material used for the samples printed using Poly-lactic acid (PLA) in the Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) method. PLA has been chosen because it is a natural and recyclable polymer derived entirely from plant sources. In the printing process samples with different mechanical properties have been obtained by changing the infill density (25% 50% and 75%) the infill pattern (gyroid triangle and grid) and the layer thickness (100 150 and 200 µm) parameters. The Design of Experiment (DoE) method is provided to find optimal combinations of the selected parameters. According to the results of the study the effect of the layer thickness differs on each output. While the infill density is 75% grid and triangle structures generally give the best results among the infill patterns, infill density of 25% varies according to the infill pattern. The gyroid and triangle patterns give optimum results for less layer thickness (e.g. 100 µm) while the grid should be preferred for higher layer thickness (e.g. 200 µm). © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Additive Manufacturing, Design For Additive Manufacturing, Design Of Experiment, Fused Deposition Modelling, Taguchi Method, Additives, Density (specific Gravity), Deposition, Design Of Experiments, Elastic Moduli, Fused Deposition Modeling, Infill Drilling, Lactic Acid, Product Design, Surface Roughness, Tensile Strength, Additive Manufacturing Technology, Design For Additive Manufacturing, Gyroids, Layer Thickness, Manufacturing Is, Minimum Time, Modeling Parameters, Poly Lactic Acid, Quality Product, Taguchi's Methods, Taguchi Methods, Additives, Density (specific gravity), Deposition, Design of experiments, Elastic moduli, Fused Deposition Modeling, Infill drilling, Lactic acid, Product design, Surface roughness, Tensile strength, Additive manufacturing technology, Design for additive manufacturing, Gyroids, Layer thickness, Manufacturing IS, Minimum time, Modeling parameters, Poly lactic acid, Quality product, Taguchi's methods, Taguchi methods

Fields of Science

0209 industrial biotechnology, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
38

Source

Computers in Industry

Volume

145

Issue

Start Page

103833

End Page

PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 42

Scopus : 59

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 131

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
4.2218

Sustainable Development Goals

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION