Optimizing fused deposition modelling parameters based on the design for additive manufacturing to enhance product sustainability

dc.contributor.author Sachin Kumar Kumar Mangla
dc.contributor.author Yigit Kazancoglu
dc.contributor.author Muruvvet Deniz Sezer
dc.contributor.author Neslihan Top
dc.contributor.author Ismail Şahin
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-06T17:49:33Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.description.abstract Nowadays designers and engineers rely on specific manufacturing guidelines to bring quality products to market with minimum time and error. Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) is one of these guides adapted to Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies used to increase the operational performance of components minimise material waste and provide design flexibility. DfAM optimises three-dimensional (3D) printing parameters to maximise the potential of AM technologies. DfAM improves ecological performance and provides many advantages for the transition to a circular economy by providing resource efficiency and enabling the production of parts with reduced weight without changing their mechanical strength. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the infill density infill pattern and layer thickness on the printing time weight Young's modulus compressive stress surface roughness tensile strength CO<inf>2</inf> emissions and amount of material used for the samples printed using Poly-lactic acid (PLA) in the Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) method. PLA has been chosen because it is a natural and recyclable polymer derived entirely from plant sources. In the printing process samples with different mechanical properties have been obtained by changing the infill density (25% 50% and 75%) the infill pattern (gyroid triangle and grid) and the layer thickness (100 150 and 200 µm) parameters. The Design of Experiment (DoE) method is provided to find optimal combinations of the selected parameters. According to the results of the study the effect of the layer thickness differs on each output. While the infill density is 75% grid and triangle structures generally give the best results among the infill patterns, infill density of 25% varies according to the infill pattern. The gyroid and triangle patterns give optimum results for less layer thickness (e.g. 100 µm) while the grid should be preferred for higher layer thickness (e.g. 200 µm). © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.compind.2022.103833
dc.identifier.issn 01663615
dc.identifier.issn 0166-3615
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85143837071&doi=10.1016%2Fj.compind.2022.103833&partnerID=40&md5=2cc2c87115e1ca3807b529251fd0b881
dc.identifier.uri https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/8487
dc.language.iso English
dc.publisher Elsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartof Computers in Industry
dc.source Computers in Industry
dc.subject Additive Manufacturing, Design For Additive Manufacturing, Design Of Experiment, Fused Deposition Modelling, Taguchi Method, Additives, Density (specific Gravity), Deposition, Design Of Experiments, Elastic Moduli, Fused Deposition Modeling, Infill Drilling, Lactic Acid, Product Design, Surface Roughness, Tensile Strength, Additive Manufacturing Technology, Design For Additive Manufacturing, Gyroids, Layer Thickness, Manufacturing Is, Minimum Time, Modeling Parameters, Poly Lactic Acid, Quality Product, Taguchi's Methods, Taguchi Methods
dc.subject Additives, Density (specific gravity), Deposition, Design of experiments, Elastic moduli, Fused Deposition Modeling, Infill drilling, Lactic acid, Product design, Surface roughness, Tensile strength, Additive manufacturing technology, Design for additive manufacturing, Gyroids, Layer thickness, Manufacturing IS, Minimum time, Modeling parameters, Poly lactic acid, Quality product, Taguchi's methods, Taguchi methods
dc.title Optimizing fused deposition modelling parameters based on the design for additive manufacturing to enhance product sustainability
dc.type Article
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.bip.impulseclass C3
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C3
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.startpage 103833
gdc.description.volume 145
gdc.identifier.openalex W4311424267
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 55.0
gdc.oaire.influence 4.0074344E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 4.2457764E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0209 industrial biotechnology
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 4.2218
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.95
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 38
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 42
gdc.plumx.mendeley 131
gdc.plumx.newscount 1
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 59
person.identifier.scopus-author-id Kumar Mangla- Sachin Kumar (55735821600), Kazancoglu- Yigit (15848066400), Sezer- Muruvvet Deniz (57218375408), Top- Neslihan (57222482703), Şahin- Ismail (57196787693)
publicationvolume.volumeNumber 145
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37

Files