Optimizing fused deposition modelling parameters based on the design for additive manufacturing to enhance product sustainability
| dc.contributor.author | Sachin Kumar Kumar Mangla | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yigit Kazancoglu | |
| dc.contributor.author | Muruvvet Deniz Sezer | |
| dc.contributor.author | Neslihan Top | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ismail Şahin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-06T17:49:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Nowadays designers and engineers rely on specific manufacturing guidelines to bring quality products to market with minimum time and error. Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) is one of these guides adapted to Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies used to increase the operational performance of components minimise material waste and provide design flexibility. DfAM optimises three-dimensional (3D) printing parameters to maximise the potential of AM technologies. DfAM improves ecological performance and provides many advantages for the transition to a circular economy by providing resource efficiency and enabling the production of parts with reduced weight without changing their mechanical strength. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the infill density infill pattern and layer thickness on the printing time weight Young's modulus compressive stress surface roughness tensile strength CO<inf>2</inf> emissions and amount of material used for the samples printed using Poly-lactic acid (PLA) in the Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) method. PLA has been chosen because it is a natural and recyclable polymer derived entirely from plant sources. In the printing process samples with different mechanical properties have been obtained by changing the infill density (25% 50% and 75%) the infill pattern (gyroid triangle and grid) and the layer thickness (100 150 and 200 µm) parameters. The Design of Experiment (DoE) method is provided to find optimal combinations of the selected parameters. According to the results of the study the effect of the layer thickness differs on each output. While the infill density is 75% grid and triangle structures generally give the best results among the infill patterns, infill density of 25% varies according to the infill pattern. The gyroid and triangle patterns give optimum results for less layer thickness (e.g. 100 µm) while the grid should be preferred for higher layer thickness (e.g. 200 µm). © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.compind.2022.103833 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 01663615 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0166-3615 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85143837071&doi=10.1016%2Fj.compind.2022.103833&partnerID=40&md5=2cc2c87115e1ca3807b529251fd0b881 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/8487 | |
| dc.language.iso | English | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier B.V. | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Computers in Industry | |
| dc.source | Computers in Industry | |
| dc.subject | Additive Manufacturing, Design For Additive Manufacturing, Design Of Experiment, Fused Deposition Modelling, Taguchi Method, Additives, Density (specific Gravity), Deposition, Design Of Experiments, Elastic Moduli, Fused Deposition Modeling, Infill Drilling, Lactic Acid, Product Design, Surface Roughness, Tensile Strength, Additive Manufacturing Technology, Design For Additive Manufacturing, Gyroids, Layer Thickness, Manufacturing Is, Minimum Time, Modeling Parameters, Poly Lactic Acid, Quality Product, Taguchi's Methods, Taguchi Methods | |
| dc.subject | Additives, Density (specific gravity), Deposition, Design of experiments, Elastic moduli, Fused Deposition Modeling, Infill drilling, Lactic acid, Product design, Surface roughness, Tensile strength, Additive manufacturing technology, Design for additive manufacturing, Gyroids, Layer thickness, Manufacturing IS, Minimum time, Modeling parameters, Poly lactic acid, Quality product, Taguchi's methods, Taguchi methods | |
| dc.title | Optimizing fused deposition modelling parameters based on the design for additive manufacturing to enhance product sustainability | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C3 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C3 | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 103833 | |
| gdc.description.volume | 145 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W4311424267 | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 55.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 4.0074344E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | false | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 4.2457764E-8 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0209 industrial biotechnology | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 02 engineering and technology | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | International | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 4.2218 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.95 | |
| gdc.openalex.toppercent | TOP 10% | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 38 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 42 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 131 | |
| gdc.plumx.newscount | 1 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 59 | |
| person.identifier.scopus-author-id | Kumar Mangla- Sachin Kumar (55735821600), Kazancoglu- Yigit (15848066400), Sezer- Muruvvet Deniz (57218375408), Top- Neslihan (57222482703), Şahin- Ismail (57196787693) | |
| publicationvolume.volumeNumber | 145 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 |
