The Evaluation of Interiority in the Identity of Public Spaces
Loading...

Date
2020
Authors
Sahar Asadollahi Asl Zarkhah
Zeynep Tuna Ultav
Gulnur Ballice
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
KONYA TECHNICAL UNIV FAC ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Purpose Public spaces in the context of everyday life in an urban environment include all places with public access and public use. Places for public interaction provide the greatest amount of human contact. In every city many interiors are considered public because they are of or pertain to the people in everyday life. As part of public spaces public interiors have an important role in creating place identity. In an urban environment place identity is defined by meanings as well as the elements of setting activities and events taking place within that environment. This paper aims to reveal the interiority attributes and elements of public interiors to determine how they influence the identity of interior places. This understanding clarifies how this differs from the more general concept of place identity in public spaces. Design/Methodology/Approach To do this a framework for identity was constructed with three components: physical setting activity and meaning based on the main theoretical perspectives of Relph (1976) and Montgomery (1998). To determine the relationships between the interiority indicators of public interiors and identity this case study focused on Kizlaragasi Inn a historic inn in Izmir and its immediate surroundings. Data concerning the components of place identity were collected through archival research observations on-site documentation questionnaires interviews behavior mapping and tracking. Findings The analysis of the attributes and elements of place identity in this public interior indicated that the interiority of public spaces can play a positive role in increasing place identity. Moreover the evaluations revealed the effect of internality in each component of place identity. Features like well-defined boundaries closeness to human scale volumetric properties legibility the potential of promoting a wide range of activities and promoting a different sensory context stem from the internality of place. Social/Practical Implications This study emphasized the importance of public and urban interiors as significant places that facilitate public life. Moreover it showed the extension of interior spaces outside the buildings which emphasized a new perspective for interior architects and urban designers by bringing a new understanding of the interiority.
Description
Keywords
Interiority, place identity, public interior, public space, Kizlaragasi Inn, PLACE, Public Interior, Place Identity, Public Space, Kizlaragasi Inn, Mimarlık, Interiority, Public Space, Interiority, public space, NA1-9428, Kızlarağası Hanı, Kamu İçi, place identity, Public İnterior, HT165.5-169.9, Architecture, Yer Kimliği, Halka Açık Alan, public interior, Place İdentity, İç Mekan, City planning, Kızlarağası Inn
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Iconarp International J. of Architecture and Planning
Volume
8
Issue
2
Start Page
567
End Page
590
PlumX Metrics
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 31
Google Scholar™


