Gün Işığı Performansı için Tepkisel Bir Cephe Sisteminin Parametrik Optimizasyonu
Loading...
Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
BIP! Indicators
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%
Abstract
Gün ışığının etkin kullanımı binalarda mekânsal nitelikleri sürdürülebilirliği ve enerji verimliliği hedeflerini artıran kritik bir tasarım girdisidir. Ortaya çıkan kinetik mimari konsepti bu hedefleri desteklemektedir. Ayrıca dinamik olarak çevreye duyarlı cephelerin tasarımına uygun yapı elemanlarının kullanılmasını önerir. Bu çalışma optimum gün ışığı verimli cephelerin tasarımı için kinetik cephe sistemlerinin potansiyelini araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Metodoloji en verimli tasarımı ortaya çıkarmak için optimize edilmiş çalışma kapsamında oluşturulmuş bir binaya uygulanan kinetik cephe modellerinin hesaplamalı modellerine dayanmaktadır. Cephe dikey eksen etrafında basit bir dönüşle hem gün ışığı kontrolü hem de görsel konfor sağlayan üçgenlere dayalı modüler bir desene sahiptir. Gün ışığı ölçümlerine dayalı panel konfigürasyonlarının parametrik analizinin sonuçları önerilen tasarımın gün ışığından yararlanma için en etkili konfigürasyonun elde edilmesine yardımcı olduğunu göstermektedir.
Description
Keywords
Mimarlık-Yeşil- Sürdürülebilir Bilim ve Teknoloji, Yeşil, Sürdürülebilir Bilim Ve Teknoloji, Mimarlık
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Ahmed M. M. Abel-Rahman A. K. & Ali A. H. H. (2015). Development of intelligent façade based on outdoor environment and indoor thermal comfort. Procedia Technology 19 742-749.Aelenei D. Aelenei L. & Vieira C. P. (2016). Adaptive Façade: concept applications research questions. Energy Procedia 91 269-275.Banihashemi Namini S. S. Shakouri M. & Sadeghi A. (2012). Analysis of Behaviour of Windows in terms of Saving Energy in Extreme Cold Weather Climes in Iran. International Journal of Engineering and Technology.Beltran L. & Liu D. I. (2020). Evaluation of Dynamic Daylight Metrics Based on Weather Location Orientation and Daylight Availability.Çıldır A. S. Köktürk G. & Tokuç A. (2020). Design approaches for retrofiting offices to reach nearly zero energy: A case study in the Mediterranean climate. Energy for Sustainable Development 58 167-181.ElBatran R. M. & Ismaeel W. S. (2021). Applying a parametric design approach for optimizing daylighting and visual comfort in office buildings. Ain Shams Engineering Journal.Fontoynont M. (2014). Daylight performance of buildings. Routledge.Freewan A. A. (2014). Impact of external shading devices on thermal and daylighting performance of offices in hot climate regions. Solar Energy 102 14-30.Hosseini S. M. Mohammadi M. Rosemann A. Schröder T. & Lichtenberg J. (2019). A morphological approach for kinetic façade design process to improve visual and thermal comfort. Building and Environment 153 186-204.Hosseini S. N. Hosseini S. M. & HeiraniPour M. (2020). The Role of Orosi’s Islamic Geometric Patterns in the Building Façade Design for Improving Occupants’ Daylight Performance. Journal of Daylighting 7(2) 201-221.Lakhdari K. Sriti L. & Painter B. (2021). Parametric optimization of daylight thermal and energy performance of middle school classrooms case of hot and dry regions. Building and Environment 204 108173.Lee J. Boubekri M. & Liang F. (2019). Impact of building design parameters on daylighting metrics using an analysis prediction and optimization approach based on statistical learning technique. Sustainability 11(5) 1474.LM I. (2013). Approved method: IES spatial Daylight autonomy (sDA) and annual sunlight exposure (ASE). Illuminating Engineering Society. https://www. ies. org/product/ies-spatial-daylight-autonomy-sda-and-annual-sunlight-exposure-ase.Manzan M. & Clarich A. (2017). FAST energy and daylight optimization of an office with fixed and movable shading devices. Building and Environment 113 175-184.Mardaljevic J. Heschong L. & Lee E. (2009). Daylight metrics and energy savings. Lighting Research & Technology 41(3) 261-283.Marzouk M. ElSharkawy M. Elsayed P. & Eissa A. (2020). Resolving deterioration of heritage building elements using an expert system. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation.Marzouk M. ElSharkawy M. & Mahmoud A. (2021). Optimizing daylight utilization of flat skylights in heritage buildings. Journal of Advanced Research.Matin N. H. Eydgahi A. & Shyu S. (2017 June). Comparative analysis of technologies used in responsive building facades. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Moloney J. (2011). Designing kinetics for architectural façades: state change. Routledge.Orhon A. V. & Altın M. (2017). Mimari sürdürülebilirlik için bir değerlendirme aracı olarak benzetim. Tesisat Mühendisliği 158 5-13.Pauley S. M. (2004). Lighting for the human circadian clock: recent research indicates that lighting has become a public health issue. Medical hypotheses 63(4) 588-596.Prieto A. Knaack U. Auer T. & Klein T. (2018). Passive cooling & climate responsive façade design: Exploring the limits of passive cooling strategies to improve the performance of commercial buildings in warm climates. Energy and Buildings 175 30-47.Ragheb A. El-Shimy H. & Ragheb G. (2016). Green architecture: A concept of sustainability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 216 778-787.Shahbazi Y. Heydari M. & Haghparast F. (2019). An early-stage design optimization for office buildings’ façade providing high-energy performance and daylight. Indoor and Built Environment 28(10) 1350-1367.Shen H. & Tzempelikos A. (2012). Daylighting and energy analysis of private offices with automated interior roller shades. Solar Energy 86(2) 681-704.Selkowitz S. Aschehoug O. & Lee E. S. (2003). Advanced Interactive Façades-Critical Elements for Future GreenBuildings? (No. LBNL-53876). Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA (US).Tabadkani A. Banihashemi S. & Hosseini M. R. (2018 August). Daylighting and visual comfort of oriental sun responsive skins: A parametric analysis. In Building simulation (Vol. 11 No. 4 pp. 663-676). Tsinghua University Press.USGBC (2017). LEED v4 for Operations and Maintenance. U.S. Green Building Council. Available from: https://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-building-operations-and- maintenance-current-version.Wagdy A. & Fathy F. (2015). A parametric approach for achieving optimum daylighting performance through solar screens in desert climates. Journal of Building Engineering 3 155-170.Yi Y. K. (2019). Building façade multi-objective optimization for daylight and aesthetical perception. Building and Environment 156 178-190.Yi Y. K. Sharston R. & Barakat D. (2019). Auxetic structures and advanced daylight control systems. Journal of Façade Design and Engineering 7(1) 63-74.Ziaee N. & Vakilinezhad R. (2022). Multi-objective optimization of daylight performance and thermal comfort in classrooms with light-shelves: Case studies in Tehran and Sari Iran. Energy and Buildings 254 111590.
WoS Q
Scopus Q
OpenCitations Citation Count
5
Source
Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD)
Volume
7
Issue
1
Start Page
72
End Page
81
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 31
Google Scholar™
