Bütün Yollar Roma’ya Mı Çıkar? Makyavelizmde Yorumlama Seviyesinin Belirlenmesinde Kültür ve Çağın Aracı Rolü
Loading...
Date
2014
Authors
Begün YETİŞER
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Abstract
Christie ve Geis (1970) Makyavelizm'i samimiyetsizlik vurdumduymazlık ve aşırı manipulatif davranış içeren bir kişilik durumu olarak tanımlamaktadır. Literatürde kültür ve pek çok demografik özelliğin Makyavelizm üzerindeki etkisi vurgulanmıştır. Ancak literatürde kültür ve demografik özelliklerin (yaş) bireylerin Makyavel eğilimleri ile eylemsel zihniyetleri arasındaki ilişkiyi analiz etmede moderatör olarak etkisini araştırmamıştır. Bu nedenle bu çalışma kültür ve katılımcıların yaşlarının bireylerin Makyavel algıları ile kronik Kurgu Seviyesi Teorisi1 (Liberman ve Trope 1998, Trope ve Liberman 2010) arasındaki ilişkiyi yönlendirmesini esas almaktadır. Çalışma katılımcıların Makyavel algıları ile \"kurgu seviyeleri\" arasındaki ilişkinin kültür ve katılımcı yaşı yönünden etkisini incelemektedir. Çalışmanın ilk kısmında kültür moderatör olarak kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak Amerikan katılımcıların Türk katılımcılara göre daha çok Makyavel eğilimde oldukları gözlemlenmiştir ve bu gözlem yalnızca katılımcıların \"somut zihniyet\"e sahip oldukları zaman anlamlandığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Çalışmanın ikinci kısmında katılımcıların yaşı moderatör olarak kullanılmıştır. Buna göre daha genç olan katılımcıların yaşları daha geçkin olan katılımcılara kıyasla daha çok Makyavel eğilimde oldukları gözlemlenmiştir ve bu gözlem çalışmanın ilk kısmında olduğu gibi yine daha \"somut zihniyet\" sahibi katılımcılarda algılanmıştır. Genel olarak çalışmada \"soyut zihniyet\"e sahip katılımcıların ne kültür ne de yaş farkı bakımından anlamlı ilişki etkisinin bulunmadığı gözlemlenmiştir. Dolayısıyla detaylı düşünme genel düşünce yapısına göre katılımcıların kültürel farklılıkları ve yaş farklılıkları bakımından farklı Makyavel eğilimlere sebebiyet vermiştir
Description
Keywords
Sosyoloji-Psikoloji-Davranış Bilimleri, Sosyoloji, Psikoloji, Davranış Bilimleri
Fields of Science
Citation
Agerström J. Björklund F. and Carlsson R.: (2012). Emotions in Time: Moral Emotions Appear More Intense With Temporal Distance Social Cognition 30(2) 181–198.Aiken L. S. and West S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions Newbury Park CA: Sage.Ali F. Amorim I.S. & Chamorro-Premuzic T. (2009). Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and Machiavellianism Personality and Individual Differences 47 758-762.Ashton M. C. Lee K. Perugini M. Szarota P. de Vries R. E. Di Blas L. Boies K. and De Raad B. (2004). A SixFactor Structure of Personality Descriptive Adjectives: Solutions from Psycholexical Studies in Seven Languages Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86 356-366.Austin E.J. Farrelly D. Black C. & Moore H. (2007). Emotional intelligence Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: does EI have a dark side? Personality and Individual Differences 43 179-189.Bazerman M. H. Tenbrunsel A. E. and Wade-Benzoni K. (1998). Negotiating with Yourself and Losing: Making Decisions with Competing Internal Preferences Academy of Management Review 23(2) 225-241.Bhawuk DPS Brislin RW. (2000). Cross-cultural training: a review Applied Psychology: An International Review 49 162–91.Cameron K.S. & Spreitzer G.M. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press.Cherulnik P. D. Way J. H. Ames S. & Hutto D. B. (1981). Impressions of high and low Machiavellian men Journal of Personality 49 388–400.Christie R. & Geis F. L. (1970). Studies of Machiavellianism London: Academic Press.Corral S. & Calvete E. (2000). Machiavellianism: Dimensionality of the Mach IV and its Relation to Self-Monitoring in a Spanish Sample The Spanish Journal of Psychology 3(1) 3-13.Daft R.L. (2008). Management Eighth Edition. USA: Thomson South-Western.Effler M. (1983). Konservatismus Machiavellianismus: Validitats- und Reliabilitatsuntersuchungen Zeitschrift fur Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 4 79–85.Exline R. V. Thibaut J. Hickey C. B. & Gumpert P. (1970). Visual interaction in relation to Machiavellianism and an unethical act In R. Christie & F. Geis (Eds.) Studies in Machiavellianism (pp. 53–77). New York: Academic Press.Eyal T. and Liberman N.: (2012). Morality and psychological distance: A construal level theory perspective’ In M.Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.) The social psychology of Morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil. Herzliya Series on Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 185–202). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Eyal T. Liberman Y. Trope Y.: (2008). Judging Near and Distant Virtue and Vice Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44(4) 1204-1209.Fehr B. Samson D. & Paulhus D. R. (1992). The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.) Advances in personality assessment Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum 77–116..Förster J. Friedman R. S. and Liberman N. (2004). Temporal Construal Effects on Abstract and Concrete Thinking: Consequences for Insight and Creative Cognition Personality and Social Psychology 87(2) 177-189.Freitas A.L. Salovey P. and Liberman N. (2001). Abstract and Concrete Self-Evaluative Goals Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(3) 410-424.Geis F. L. & Moon T. H. (1981). Machiavellianism and deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41 766–775.Gino F. and Galinsky A. D.: (2012). Vicarious dishonesty: When psychological closeness creates distance from one’s moral compass Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 119(1) 15-26.Gunnthorsdottir A. McGabe K. and Smith V. (2002). Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game Journal of Economic Psychology 23 49-66.Hare R. D. (1993). Without conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us New York: Guilford. Hofstede G. (1980) Cultural Consequences: Intemational Differences in Work Related Values Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.Hunt S. D. and Chonko L. (1984). Marketing and Machiavellianism Journal of Marketing Summer 30-42.Jones D. N. & Paulhus D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Doyle (Eds.) Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108) New York: Guilford.Kashima Y. Yamaguchi S. Kim U. Choi S.-C. Gelfand M. J.&Yuki M. (1995). Culture gender and self: A perspective from individualism– collectivism research Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 925– 937.Kivetz Y. and Tyler T. R. (2007). Tomorrow I’ll be me: The effect of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102(2) 193-211.Kolb R.W. (2008). Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society 3. Sage Publications. Leary M.R. and Hoyle R.H. (2009). Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior The Guilford Press.Lee K. and Ashton M. C. (2005). Psychopathy Machiavellianism and Narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure Personality and Individual Differences 38(7) 1571-1582.Liberman N. & Trope Y. (1998). The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 5–18.Liberman N. Sagristano M. D. Trope Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38(6) 523–534.McGuire D. & Hutchings K. (2006). A Machiavellian analysis of organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change 19(2) 192-209.Milkman K. L. Rogers T. and Bazerman M. H. (2008). Harnessing Our Inner Angels and Demons: What We Have Learned About Want/Should Conflicts and How That Knowledge Can Help Us Reduce Short-Sighted Decision Making Perspectives on Psychological Science 3(4) 324-338.Mischel W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & S. Endler (Eds.) Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactive psychology (pp. 333–352) Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Mudrack P. E. and Mason E. S. (1995). Extending the Machiavellianism Construct: A Brief Measure and Some Unexplored relationships Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10(1) 187-200.Muncy J. A. and S. J. Vitell: 1992 ‘Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of the Final Consumer’ Journal of Business Research 24(June) 297–311.Neter J Wasserman W Kutner M.H.: (1985). Applied linear statistical models: regression analysis of variance and experimental designs. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.Oyserman D. and Lee S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism Psychological Bulletin 134 311–342.Paulhus D. L. and Williams K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism Machiavellianism and psychopathy Journal of Research in Personality 36 556-563.Petrides K. V. Vernon P. A. Aitken J. Vaselka S. and Veselka L. (2011). Trait Emotional Intelligence and the Dark Triad Traits of Personality Twin Research and Human Genetics 14(1) 35-41.Raskin R. & Terry H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 890–902.Robbins S.P. & Coulter M. (2012). Management. Eleventh Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Rogers T. and Bazerman M. H. (2008). Future lock-in: Future implementation increases selection of ‘should’ choices Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 106 1-20.Rosch E.: (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104(3) 192-233.Sinha J.B.P. (2008). Culture and Organizational Behaviour New Delhi: Sage Publications. Triandis H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes American Psychologist 51(4) 407-415.Trope Y. and Liberman N (2010). Construal Level Theory of Psychological Distance Psychological Review 117(2)440-463.Trope Y. and Liberman N. (2000). Temporal Construal and Time-Dependent Changes in Preference Personality and Social Psychology 79(6) 876-889.Vallacher R. R. and Wegner D. M.: 1989 ‘Levels of Personal Agency: Individual Variation in Action Identification’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(4) 660-671.Vecchio R. P. & Sussmann M. (1991). Choice of influence tactics: Individual and Organizational Determinants Journal of Organizational Behavior 12 73–80.Veselka L. Schermer J. A. and Vertnon P. A. (2012). The Dark Triad and an Expanded Framework of Personality Personality and Individual Differences 53 417–425.Vigoda-Gadot E. and Drory A. (2006) Handbook of Organizational Politics Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Vitell S. J. and J. Muncy: (1992) Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Ethical Judgments of the Final Consumer Journal of Business Ethics 11(8) 585-597.Walter H.L Anderson C.M. and Martin M.M.: (2005). How Subordinates’ Machiavellianism and Motives Relate to Satisfaction with Superiors Communication Quarterly 53(1) 57-70.Wilson D. S. Near D. C. and Miller R. R.: (1998). Individual differences in Machiavellianism as a mix of cooperative and exploitative strategies Evolution and Human Behavior 19 203–212.Wilson D.S. Near D. and Miller R. R.: (1996). Machiavellianism: A Synthesis of the Evolutionary and Psychological Literatures Psychological Bulletin 119(2) 285-299.
WoS Q
Scopus Q
Source
Journal of Yasar University
Volume
9
Issue
36
Start Page
6328
End Page
6337
Collections
