Reflective thinking predicts lower conspiracy beliefs: A meta-analysis

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2022

Authors

Büsra Elif Yelbuz
Ecesu Madan
Sinan Alper

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Society for Judgment and Decision making

Open Access Color

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

One of the many established predictors of conspiracy beliefs is reflective thinking but no meta-analysis so far has examined this relationship. In the current meta-analysis of published and unpublished correlational data (145 samples 181 effect sizes) we found a significant negative association between reflective thinking and conspiracy beliefs with a medium-level effect size (r = –.189). Similar levels of correlations were found across different types of measures (self-report vs. performance-based) and conspiracy beliefs (generic vs. specific). Further no evidence suggested publication bias in this body of work. Suggestions for future research are discussed. © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Analytical, Conspiracy, Intuitive, Meta-analysis, Reflective

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

Source

Volume

Issue

Start Page

End Page

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™

Sustainable Development Goals