Akademik Örgütlerde Dedikodu ve Söylentilere\rYönelik Alg›lar
| dc.contributor.author | Pınar ÖZŞARLAK | |
| dc.contributor.author | Umit Atabek | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gülseren Şendur Atabek | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-22T16:05:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Literatürde akademik örgütlerde gayriresmi iletiflim türü olarak dedikodu\rve söylentiler konusu oldukça az çal›fl›lm›flt›r. Bu çal›flmada Türk üniversitelerinde akademisyenlerin dedikodu ve söylentiler hakk›ndaki alg›lar› ile\rdedikodu ve söylentilerin konular› ve çeflitli örgüt kültürü unsurlar›yla iliflkisi incelenmektedir. Bu amaçla web tabanl› bir soru ka¤›d› 356 iletiflim alan› akademisyenine uygulanm›flt›r. Bulgular akademik örgütlerde dedikodu\rve söylentilerin oldukça yayg›n oldu¤unu göstermektedir. Örgüt içi dedikodu ve söylentiler örgüt d›fl› dedikodu ve söylentilere göre daha yo¤un alg›-\rlanmakta ve yönetim ve özlük haklar› konular›ndaki dedikodu ve söylentiler\rön s›ralarda yer almaktad›r. Öte yandan akademisyenlerin dedikodu ve söylentiler hakk›ndaki kanaatleri genellikle olumsuzdur. Ancak akademik örgütlerde alg›lanan örgüt demokrasi düzeyi ve örgüt içi iletiflim artt›kça dedikodu ve söylentiler hakk›ndaki olumsuz kanaatlerin azald›¤› bulgulanm›flt›r. Akademik yöneticilerin kurumlar›ndaki demokratik kat›l›m› ve iç iletiflimi iyilefltirmedikçe dedikodu ve söylentilerle bafl edebilmelerinin zor olaca-\r¤› görülmektedir. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Adkins K. C. (2014). The erasure of empowered gossip in academia. Nouvelle Revue Synergies Canada 7 1–10.Ak›nc› Vural Z. B. (2010). Kurum kültürü (3. bas›m). ‹stanbul: ‹letiflim Yay›nlar›.Altuntafl S. fiahin Altun Ö. & Çevik Aky›l R. (2017). “Gossip” in organizational communication between nurse doctor and dentist academicians. Journal of Health and Nursing Management 4(3) 107–116.Applbaum R. L. & Anatol K. W. E. (1979). The relationships among job satisfaction organizational norms and communicational climate among employees in an academic organization. Journal of Applied Communication Research 7(2) 83–90.Arabac› ‹. B. Sünkür M. & fiimflek F. Z. (2012). Ö¤retmenlerin dedikodu ve söylenti mekanizmas›na iliflkin görüflleri: Nitel bir çal›flma. Kuram ve Uygulamada E¤itim Yönetimi 18(2) 171-190.Arnold J. & Feldman C. (1986). Organizational behavior. New York NY: McGraw Hill Book.Atabek Ü. (1991). Örgüt ve iletiflim: Bir örgütsel iletiflim arac› olarak telsiz. Yay›mlanmam›fl doktora tezi Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Ankara.Ben-Ze’ev A. (1994). The vindication of gossip. In Goodman R. F. & BenZe’ev A. (Eds.) Good gossip (pp. 11–24). Lawrence KS: University Press of Kansas.Bennett R. (1994). Organizational behavior (2nd ed.). Singapore: M&E Handbook Series.Bordia P. Hunt E. Paulsen N. Tourish D. & DiFonzo N. (2004). Uncertainty during organizational change: Is it all about control? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 13(3) 345–365.Bourdieu P. (1987). What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 32 1–17.Bourdieu P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Cengiz A. K. (2017). Bir yerli olma ba¤lam›nda dedikodu söylentiler ve Antakyal›l›k. Akademik Sosyal Araflt›rmalar Dergisi 5(51) 311–327.Clegg S. R. & van Iterson A. (2009). Dishing the dirt: Gossiping in organizations. Culture and Organization 15(3–4) 275–289.Cohen L. Manion L. & Morrison K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge/Falmer.Çe¤in G. & Göker E. (2012). Tözcülü¤ün tasfiyesi: ‹liflkisel sosyolojide temel yaklafl›mlar. Ankara: Notabene Yay›nlar›.Dan›fl M. S. (2015). Dedikodunun sosyolojisi. Yay›mlanmam›fl yüksek lisans tezi Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyoloji Anabilim Dal› Konya.Darmon D. J. (2018). Researching the mechanisms of gossip in organizations: From fly on the wall to fly in the soup. The Qualitative Report 23(7) 1736–1751.Davis K. (1953). A method of studying communication patterns in organizations. Personnel Psychology 6(3) 301–312.Davis K. (1981). Human behavior at work (6th ed.). New Delhi: McGrawHill Inc.DiFonzo N. & Bordia P. (2000). How top PR professionals handle hearsay: Corporate rumors their effects and strategies to manage them. Public Relations Review 26(2) 173–190.DiFonzo N. & Bordia P. (2002). Corporate rumor activity belief and accuracy. Public Relations Review 28(1) 1–18.DiFonzo N. & Bordia P. (2007). Rumor gossip and urban legends. Diogenes 213 19–35.DiFonzo N. Bordia P. & Rosnow R. L. (1994). Reining in rumors. Organizational Dynamics 23(1) 47–62.Ellwardt L. (2011). Gossip in organizations: A social network study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Groningen Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences Heymans Institute (Psychology) Groningen Holland.Esposito J. L. & Rosnow R. L. (1983). Corporate rumors: How they start and how to stop them. Management Review 72 44–49. Eflkin F. (2010). Dedikodu ve söylenti: Ölçek gelifltirme çal›flmas› ve hemflirelikte bir uygulama. Yay›mlanmam›fl yüksek lisans tezi ‹stanbul Üniversitesi Sa¤l›k Bilimleri Enstitüsü ‹stanbul.Gizir S. & fiimflek H. (2005). Communication in an academic context. Higher Education 50(2) 197–221.Gouveia C. M. Vuuren L. J. & Crafford A. (2005). Towards a typology of gossip in the workplace. SA Journal of Human Resource Management 3(2) 56–68.Grosser T. J. Lopez-Kidwell V. & Labianca G. (2010) A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group & Organization Management 35(2) 177–212.Haukland L. (2017). The Bologna process: The democracy–bureaucracy dilemma. Journal of Further and Higher Education 41(3) 261–272.Hickson M. (1974). Participation-observation technique in organizational communication research. Journal of Business Communication 11(3) 37–42.Kapferer J. N. (1992). Dünyan›n en eski medyas›: Dedikodu ve söylenti. ‹stanbul: ‹letiflim Yay›nlar›.Kerr A. (2004). The limits of organizational democracy. Academy of Management Executive 18(3) 81–97.Kilduff M. & Brass D. J. (2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. The Academy of Management Annals 4(1) 317–357.Kurland B. N. & Pelled L. H. (2000). Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. Academy of Management Review 25(2). 428–438.Lammers J. C. & Barbour J. B. (2006). An institutional theory of organizational communication. Communication Theory 16(3) 356–377.Lane J.-E. (1985). Academic profession in academic organization. Higher Education 14(3) 241–268.Leblebici N. D. Y›ld›z H. H. & Karasoy A. (2009). Örgütsel yaflamda dedikodunun araçsall›¤› ve alg›lan›fl›. Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araflt›rmalar Dergisi 18(9) 561–574.Luthans F. (1989). Organizational behavior (5th ed.). Singapore: McGraw Hill International Editions.Michelson G. & Mouly V. S. (2004). Do loose lips sink ships? The meaning antecedents and consequences of rumour and gossip in organisations. Corporate Communications 9(3) 189–201.Mishra J. (1990). Managing the grapevine. Public Personnel Management 19(2) 213–228.Nalbanto¤lu H. Ü. (2003). Üniversite A.fi.’de bir ‘homo academicus’: “ersatz” yuppie akademisyen. Toplum ve Bilim 97 7–42.Newstrom J. W. Monczka R. E. & Reiff W. E. (1974). Perceptions of the grapevine: Its value and influence. The Journal of Business Communication 11(3) 12–20.Nikaeen M. Zarei R. & Matin H. Z. (2014). Do the organizational rumors emphasize the influence of organizational silence over organizational commitment? Journal of Social Issues & Humanities 2(1) 88–93.Noon M. & Delbridge R. (1993). News from behind my hands: Gossip in organizations. Organization Studies 14(1) 23–36.Peters T. J. & Waterman R. H. Jr. (1982). In search of excellence lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York NY: Harper& Row Publishers.Pheko M. M. (2018). Rumors and gossip as tools of social undermining and social dominance in workplace bullying and mobbing practices: A closer look at perceived perpetrator motives. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 28(4) 449–465.Polato¤lu A. (1984). Örgüt kuramlar› ve iletiflim. Amme ‹daresi Dergisi 17(4) 62–76.Robbins S. P. & Judge T. A. (2011). Organizational behavior (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Rooks G. Tazelaar F. & Snijders C. (2011). Gossip and reputation in business networks. European Sociological Review 27(1) 90–106.Rosnow R. L. & Foster E. K. (2005). Rumor and gossip research. American Psychological Association Psychological Science Agenda. Spring 2005. Eriflim adresi http://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2005/04/ gossip.aspx (12 Temmuz 2016).Shockley-Zalabak P. S. (2015). Fundamentals of organizational communication: Knowledge sensitivity skills values (9th ed.). Boston MA: Pearson.Simon H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organisations (4th ed.) New York NY: Free Press.Solmaz B. (2003). Söylentilerin kurumsal iletiflim aç›s›ndan de¤erlendirilmesi ve bir uygulama örne¤i. Yay›mlanmam›fl doktora tezi Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Eskiflehir.Solmaz B. (2004). Söylenti ve dedikodu yönetimi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (SUSBED) 16 563–575.Sözen H. C. (2012). Social networks and power in organizations. Personnel Review 41(4) 487–512.Stewart P. J. & Strathern A. (2004). Witchcraft sorcery rumors and gossip. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suls J. M. (1977). Gossip as social comparison. Journal of Communication 27(1) 164–168.Sutton H. & Porter L. W. (1968). A study of grapevine in a governmental organization. Personnel Psychology 21 223–230.Tebbutt M. & Marchington M. (1997). “Look before you speak”: Gossip and the insecure workplace. Work Employment & Society 11(4) 713–735.Temel E¤inli A. & Bitirim S. (2008). Kurumsal baflar›n›n önündeki engel: Zehirli (toksik) iletiflim. Selçuk ‹letiflim 5(3) 124–140.Tuire P. & Erno L. (2001). Exploring invisible scientific communities: Studying networking relations within an educational research community. A Finnish case. Higher Education 42(4) 493–513.Vaidyanathan B. Khalsa S. & Howard Ecklund E. (2016). Gossip as social control: Informal sanctions on ethical violations in scientific workplaces. Social Problems 63(4) 554–572.Vorell M. S. Carmack H. J. & Scarduizo J. A. (2014). Surviving work: Toxic organizational communication. Dubuque IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing.Weisbrod B. A. Ballou J. P. & Asch E. D. (2008). Mission and money: Understanding the university. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Westacott E. (2012). The virtues of our vices: A modest defense of gossip rudeness and other bad habits. Upper Saddle River NJ: Princeton University Press.Wittek R. & Wielers R. (1998). Gossip in organizations. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 4(2) 189–204.Wood J. (1999). Establishing ›nternal communication channels that work. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 21(2) 135–149.Ya¤murlu A. (2004). Örgüt kuramlar› ve iletiflim. Amme ‹daresi Dergisi 37(4) 31–55.YÖK (2020). Yüksekö¤retim istatistikleri. Eriflim adresi https://istatistik.yok. gov.tr (18 May›s 2020).Zak M. W. (1994). “It’s like a prison in there”: Organizational fragmentation in a demographically diversified workplace. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 8(3) 281–298. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2399/yod.20.514008 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2146-796X | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2146-7978 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/10634 | |
| dc.language.iso | Türkçe | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Yuksekogretim Dergisi | |
| dc.source | Yükseköğretim Dergisi | |
| dc.subject | Eğitim- Eğitim Araştırmaları | |
| dc.title | Akademik Örgütlerde Dedikodu ve Söylentilere\rYönelik Alg›lar | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C4 | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.endpage | 122 | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 111 | |
| gdc.description.volume | 11 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W3132090842 | |
| gdc.index.type | TR-Dizin | |
| gdc.oaire.accesstype | GOLD | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 2.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 2.6254146E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | false | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 4.372096E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0502 economics and business | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 05 social sciences | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0211 other engineering and technologies | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 02 engineering and technology | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | National | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 1.0889 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.82 | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 3 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 2 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 5 | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 122 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 111 | |
| publicationissue.issueNumber | 1 | |
| publicationvolume.volumeNumber | 11 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 |