Liability of foreignness and anti-corruption reporting in an emerging market: The case of Turkish listed companies
Loading...

Date
2019
Authors
Manuel Castelo Branco
Catarina J.M. Delgado
Duygu Türker
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This study examines the association between different types of dependency on resources and/or pressures from the international community and the reporting practices on the fight against corruption of companies in an emerging country setting that of Turkey. More specifically we focus on the influence of multinationality cross-listing and membership of the United Nations Global Compact on this type of reporting. We use ordinal regression analysis to explore the association between the three factors mentioned above and anti-corruption reporting for a sample of Turkish firms on the Borsa Istanbul 100 index while controlling for some other factors likely to influence anti-corruption reporting. Findings show a low level of reporting. They also suggest that companies with their shares cross-listed and companies which are members of the Uited Nations Global Compact do present higher levels of anti-corruption reporting than their counterparts. © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Anti-corruption Reporting, Cross-listing, Multinationality, Turkey, Regression Analysis, Anti-corruption, Cross-listing, Emerging Countries, International Community, Liability Of Foreignness, Multinationality, Ordinal Regression Analysis, Turkey, Crime, Regression analysis, Anti-corruption, Cross-listing, Emerging countries, International community, Liability of foreignness, Multinationality, Ordinal regression analysis, Turkey, Crime
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
15
Source
Journal of Cleaner Production
Volume
232
Issue
Start Page
118
End Page
126
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 18
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 84
Google Scholar™


