A comparative study on conventional and advanced exergetic analyses of geothermal district heating systems based on actual operational data
Loading...

Date
2013
Authors
Arif Hepbasli
Ali Kecebas
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This paper comparatively evaluates exergy destructions of a geothermal district heating system (GDHS) using both conventional and advanced exergetic analysis methods to identify the potential for improvement and the interactions among the components. As a real case study the Afyon GDHS in Afyonkarahisar Turkey is considered based on actual operational data. For the first time advanced exergetic analysis is applied to the GDHSs in which the exergy destruction rate within each component is split into unavoidable/avoidable and endogenous/exogenous parts. The results indicate that the interconnections among all the components are not very strong. Thus one should focus on how to reduce the internal inefficiency (destruction) rates of the components. The highest priority for improvement in the advanced exergetic analysis is in the re-injection pump (PM-IX) while it is the heat exchanger (HEX-III) in the conventional analysis. In addition there is a substantial influence on the overall system as the total avoidable exergy destruction rate of the heat exchanger (HEX-V) has the highest value. On the overall system basis the value for the conventional exergetic efficiency is determined to be 29.29% while that for the modified exergetic efficiency is calculated to be 34.46% through improving the overall components. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Geothermal energy, District heating system, Exergy destruction, Conventional exergetic analysis, Advanced exergetic analysis, Buildings, CYCLE POWER-PLANT, TURKEY, PERFORMANCE, BALCOVA, COSTS, IZMIR
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
34
Source
Energy and Buildings
Volume
61
Issue
Start Page
193
End Page
201
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 21
Scopus : 40
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 46
Google Scholar™


