Sustainability benchmarking for logistics center location decision An example from an emerging country
Loading...

Date
2020
Authors
Yigit Kazancoglu
Melisa Ozbiltekin
Yesim Deniz Ozkan-Ozen
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Purpose As in line with eco benchmarking the purpose of this paper is to solve a location selection problem in an emerging country by applying sustainability benchmarking principles. Design/methodology/approach A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method fuzzy AHP and Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) is used as methodology to make sustainability benchmarking for logistics center location selection. Findings It is revealed that according to AHP and PROMETHEE calculations Kemalpasa is determined as the most appropriate location from the sustainable perspectives. Torbali is specified as the worst location to construct a logistics center in terms of benchmarking criteria based on sustainability concerns. Based on these numerical results managerial implications are presented with a sustainability benchmarking view. Originality/value The main originality of this study is integrating one of the relatively new topics sustainability benchmarking with a popular area logistics center location selection.
Description
Keywords
Sustainability, Benchmarking, PROMETHEE, Fuzzy AHP, Logistics centre, FUZZY AHP, PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT, SELECTION, MODEL, MANAGEMENT, STRATEGIES, CRITERIA, TOPSIS, US, Promethee, Benchmarking, Logistics Centre, Sustainability, Fuzzy AHP
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences, 0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
13
Source
Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal
Volume
31
Issue
5
Start Page
1239
End Page
1260
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 12
Scopus : 15
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 57
SCOPUS™ Citations
15
checked on Apr 09, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
14
checked on Apr 09, 2026
Google Scholar™


