Q-learning guided algorithms for bi-criteria minimization of total flow time and makespan in no-wait permutation flowshops
Loading...

Date
2024
Authors
Damla Yuksel
Levent Kandiller
Mehmet Fatih Tasgetiren
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Combining Deep Reinforcement Learning and meta-heuristic techniques represents a new research direction for enhancing the search capabilities of meta-heuristic methods in the context of production scheduling. Q-learning is a prominent reinforcement learning in which its utilization aims to direct the selection of actions thus preventing the necessity for a random exploration in the iterative process of the metaheuristics. In this study we provide Q-learning guided algorithms for the Bi-Criteria No-Wait Flowshop Scheduling Problem (NWFSP). The problem is treated as a bi-criteria combinatorial optimization problem where total flow time and makespan are optimized simultaneously. Firstly a deterministic mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model is provided. Then Q-learning guided algorithms are developed: Bi-Criteria Iterated Greedy Algorithm with Q-Learning (BCIGQL). Bi-Criteria Block Insertion Heuristic Algorithm with Q-Learning (BC-BIHQL). Moreover the performance of the proposed Q-learning guided algorithms is compared over a collection of Bi-Criteria Genetic Local Search Algorithms (BC-GLS) Bi-Criteria Iterated Greedy Algorithm (BC-IG) Bi-Criteria Iterated Greedy Algorithm with a Local Search (BC-IGALL) and Bi-Criteria Variable Block Insertion Heuristic Algorithm (BC-VBIH). The complete computational experiment performed on 480 problem instances of Vallada et al. (2015) which is known as the VRF benchmark set indicates that the BC-BIHQL and the BC-IGQL algorithms outperform the BC-GLS BC-IG BCIGALL and BC-VBIH algorithms in comparative performance metrics. More specifically the proposed BC-BIHQL and BC-IGQL algorithms can yield more non-dominated bi-criteria solutions with the most substantial competitiveness than the remaining algorithms. At the same time both are competitive with each other on the benchmark problems. Moreover the BC-IGQL algorithm dominates almost 97% and 99% of the solutions reached by the BC-IG BC-IGALL and BC-VBIH algorithms in small and large datasets. Similarly The BC-BIHQL algorithm dominates almost 98% and 99% of the solutions reached by the BC-IG BC-IGALL and BC-VBIH algorithms in small and large datasets respectively. This means that among all the features that have been compared the Qlearning-guided algorithms demonstrate the highest level of competitiveness. The outcomes of this study encourage us to discover many more bi-criteria NWFSPs to reveal the trade-off between other conflicting objectives such as makespan & the number of early jobs to overcome various industries' problems.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Bi-criteria scheduling problems, No -wait flowshop scheduling problem, Makespan, Total flow time, Mixed -integer linear programming, Bi-criteria heuristic optimization, TOTAL WEIGHTED TARDINESS, MULTIOBJECTIVE ELECTROMAGNETISM ALGORITHM, ITERATED GREEDY ALGORITHM, DEPENDENT SETUP TIMES, SCHEDULING PROBLEM, SINGLE-MACHINE, LOCAL SEARCH, MEMETIC ALGORITHM, OPTIMIZATION, SUBJECT, Makespan, Bi-Criteria Heuristic Optimization, Mixed -Integer Linear Programming, Bi-Criteria Scheduling Problems, No-Wait Flowshop Scheduling Problem, Mixed-Integer Linear Programming, No -Wait Flowshop Scheduling Problem, Total Flow Time
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
10
Source
Swarm and Evolutionary Computation
Volume
89
Issue
Start Page
101617
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 14
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 4
SCOPUS™ Citations
14
checked on Apr 10, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
15
checked on Apr 10, 2026
Google Scholar™


