Daily river flow simulation using ensemble disjoint aggregating M5-Prime model
Loading...

Date
2024
Authors
Khabat Khosravi
Nasrin Fathollahzadeh Attar
Sayed M. Bateni
Changhyun Jun
Dongkyun Kim
Mir Jafar Sadegh Safari
Salim Heddam
Aitazaz Ahsan Farooque
Soroush Abolfathi
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Accurate prediction of daily river flow (Q<inf>t</inf>) remains a challenging yet essential task in hydrological modeling particularly crucial for flood mitigation and water resource management. This study introduces an advanced M5 Prime (M5P) predictive model designed to estimate Q<inf>t</inf> as well as one- and two-day-ahead river flow forecasts (i.e. Q<inf>t+1</inf> and Q<inf>t+2</inf>). The predictive performance of M5P ensembles incorporating Bootstrap Aggregation (BA) Disjoint Aggregating (DA) Additive Regression (AR) Vote (V) Iterative classifier optimizer (ICO) Random Subspace (RS) and Rotation Forest (ROF) were comprehensively evaluated. The proposed models were applied to a case study data in Tuolumne County US using a dataset comprising measured precipitation (P<inf>t</inf>) evaporation (E<inf>t</inf>) and Q<inf>t</inf>. A wide range of input scenarios were explored for predicting Q<inf>t</inf> Q<inf>t+1</inf> and Q<inf>t+2</inf>. Results indicate that P<inf>t</inf> and Q<inf>t</inf> significantly influence prediction accuracy. Notably relying solely on the most correlated variable (e.g. Q<inf>t-1</inf>) does not guarantee robust prediction of Q<inf>t</inf>. However extending the forecast horizon mitigates the influence of low-correlation input variables on model accuracy. Performance metrics indicate that the DA-M5P model achieves superior results with Nash-Sutcliff Efficiency of 0.916 and root mean square error of 23 m3/s followed by ROF-M5P BA-M5P AR-M5P AR-M5P RS-M5P V-M5P ICO-M5P and the standalone M5P model. The ensemble M5P modeling framework enhanced the predictive capability of the stand-alone M5P algorithm by 1.2 %–22.6 % underscoring its efficacy and potential for advancing hydrological forecasting. © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Forecasting, Hybrid Machine Learning, M5p, Machine Learning, Predictive Model, River Flow, M5P, Hybrid Machine Learning, Predictive Model, River Flow, Machine Learning, Forecasting, Social sciences (General), H1-99, Hybrid machine learning, Q1-390, Science (General), Predictive model, River flow, Machine learning, M5P, Forecasting, Research Article
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
41
Source
Heliyon
Volume
10
Issue
20
Start Page
e37965
End Page
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 61
Scopus : 59
PubMed : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 40
SCOPUS™ Citations
59
checked on Apr 09, 2026
Google Scholar™


