Self-Adaptive Genetic Algorithm For Permutation Flow Shop Scheduling Problems

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2023

Authors

Cihanser Çaliskan
Kazım Erdoǧdu

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

The permutation flow shop scheduling problem (PFSSP) is a well-known extensively researched and heavily applied non-polynomial (NP)-Hard combinatorial optimization problem. It is encountered in various real-life manufacturing problems such as automotive manufacturing integrated circuit fabrication and agricultural food industries. It continues to gain popularity in operational research areas as new manufacturing areas are developed. Therefore finding a solution to these NP-Hard problems attract the attention of scientists. In this paper we studied a PFSSP and proposed a new heuristic for its solution: The Self-Adaptive Genetic Algorithm (GA). This proposed algorithm uses a conventional GA with cycle crossover and random swap mutation. Its novelty on the other hand lies in incorporating an adaptive mechanism in the GA. The proposed algorithm uses three different local searches (i.e. 2-Opt Greedy Insert and Greedy Swap local searches) based on their successes. In other words the proposed algorithm evaluates the performance of each local search at each generational iteration and makes a decision on which one to use based on their previous performances. The more successful local searches increase their probability of selection and vice versa. This way Self-Adaptive GA hence the name adapts and directs its exploitation by the information it obtains in its previous generations. The proposed algorithm was applied to a subset of well-known Taillard problem instances. The experimental studies show its successful performance. Self-Adaptive GA obtained the optimum results for 7 out of 18 benchmark instances. In the rest of the 11 instances the differences between the results of the proposed method and the optimum values are less than 2%. © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Evolutionary Algorithm, Genetic Algorithm, Local Search, Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problem, Self-adaptive Heuristic, Benchmarking, Combinatorial Optimization, Computational Complexity, Industrial Research, Iterative Methods, Local Search (optimization), Machine Shop Practice, Adaptive Heuristics, Automotive Manufacturing, Combinatorial Optimization Problems, Flow Shop Scheduling Problem, Local Search, Performance, Permutation Flow-shop Scheduling, Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problems, Self Adaptive Genetic Algorithm, Self-adaptive Heuristic, Genetic Algorithms, Benchmarking, Combinatorial optimization, Computational complexity, Industrial research, Iterative methods, Local search (optimization), Machine shop practice, Adaptive heuristics, Automotive manufacturing, Combinatorial optimization problems, Flow shop scheduling problem, Local search, Performance, Permutation flow-shop scheduling, Permutation flowshop scheduling problems, Self adaptive genetic algorithm, Self-adaptive heuristic, Genetic algorithms, Genetic Algorithm, Self-Adaptive Heuristic, Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problem, Local Search, Evolutionary Algorithm

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

10th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering ICEEE 2023

Volume

Issue

Start Page

207

End Page

213
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 1

SCOPUS™ Citations

1

checked on Apr 11, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.2074

Sustainable Development Goals

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE