Analysis of barriers to circularity for agricultural cooperatives in the digitalization era
Loading...

Date
2022
Authors
Erhan Ada
Muhittin Saǧnak
Ruhan Askin-Uzel
İrem Balcıoğlu
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to propose a novel framework for barriers to circularity within cooperative supply chains. The barriers in the adoption and implementation of circular economy principles are examined within a framework. Design/methodology/approach: Fuzzy best-worst method is used to calculate the weights of barriers and identify the prioritization of barriers to circularity within cooperative supply chain. Findings: “Insufficient implementation of circular economy laws” was found as the most important barrier followed by “Lack of information” “Ineffective recycling policies” “Lack of awareness for circular economy” “Remanufacturing is a labor-intensive procedure” “Inconsistent price policies in sources and products” “Lack of environmental management system” “Cost of implementation for green activities” and “Lack of R&D capability” barriers respectively. Research limitations/implications: The number of participant professionals limits the conclusions of the study and reaching more general conclusions. A comprehensive research can be conducted by the participation of a greater number of professionals. Originality/value: Several studies analyzed the barriers to circularity, however to the best of the authors' knowledge no study has been taken an approach for barriers to circularity for cooperatives or cooperative supply chains. © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Barriers, Circular Economy, Cooperatives, Fuzzy Best-worst Method
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
25
Source
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
Volume
71
Issue
Start Page
932
End Page
951
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 24
Scopus : 34
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 164
Google Scholar™


