Predicting waiting and treatment times in emergency departments using ordinal logistic regression models
Loading...

Date
2021
Authors
Mustafa Gökalp Ataman
Gorkem Sariyer
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
W.B. Saunders
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Background: Since providing timely care is the primary concern of emergency departments (EDs) long waiting times increase patient dissatisfaction and adverse outcomes. Especially in overcrowded ED environments emergency care quality can be significantly improved by developing predictive models of patients' waiting and treatment times to use in ED operations planning. Methods: Retrospective data on 37711 patients arriving at the ED of a large urban hospital were examined. Ordinal logistic regression models were proposed to identify factors causing increased waiting and treatment times and classify patients with longer waiting and treatment times. Results: According to the proposed ordinal logistic regression model for waiting time prediction age arrival mode and ICD-10 encoded diagnoses are all significant predictors. The model had 52.247% accuracy. The model for treatment time showed that in addition to age arrival mode and diagnosis triage level was also a significant predictor. The model had 66.365% accuracy. The model coefficients had negative signs in the corresponding models indicating that waiting times are negatively related to treatment times. Conclusion: By predicting patients' waiting and treatment times ED workloads can be assessed instantly. This enables ED personnel to be scheduled to better manage demand supply deficiencies increase patient satisfaction by informing patients and relatives about expected waiting times and evaluate performances to improve ED operations and emergency care quality. © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Emergency Department, Icd-10, Treatment Time, Triage, Waiting Time, Adult, Article, Emergency Health Service, Emergency Ward, Female, Human, Icd-10, Major Clinical Study, Male, Patient Satisfaction, Prediction, Relative, Retrospective Study, Urban Hospital, Workload, Adolescent, Age, Aged, Child, Crowding (area), Hospital Admission, Hospital Emergency Service, Infant, Middle Aged, Newborn, Preschool Child, Sex Factor, Statistical Model, Very Elderly, Young Adult, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged 80 And Over, Child, Child Preschool, Crowding, Emergency Service Hospital, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant Newborn, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Triage, Waiting Lists, Young Adult, adult, article, emergency health service, emergency ward, female, human, ICD-10, major clinical study, male, patient satisfaction, prediction, relative, retrospective study, urban hospital, workload, adolescent, age, aged, child, crowding (area), hospital admission, hospital emergency service, infant, middle aged, newborn, preschool child, sex factor, statistical model, very elderly, young adult, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged 80 and over, Child, Child Preschool, Crowding, Emergency Service Hospital, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant Newborn, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Triage, Waiting Lists, Young Adult, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Waiting Lists, Age Factors, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Middle Aged, Crowding, Logistic Models, Sex Factors, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Triage, Child, Emergency Service, Hospital, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
29
Source
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume
46
Issue
Start Page
45
End Page
50
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 32
Scopus : 35
PubMed : 8
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 82
Google Scholar™


