A model for estimating the carbon footprint of maritime transportation of Liquefied Natural Gas under uncertainty

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2021

Authors

Saleh Aseel
Hussein Al-Yafei
Murat Küçükvar
Nuri Cihat Cihat Onat
Metin Türkay
Yigit Kazancoglu
Ahmed Al-Sulaiti
Abdulla Radi Al-Hajri

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier B.V.

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

The demand for Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) in the global markets has changed significantly. As a result industries have been forced to consider investing significantly in supply chains to achieve an efficient distribution of LNG for cost efficiency and carbon footprint reduction. To minimize the contribution of LNG maritime transportation to global climate change there is a need to quantify the carbon footprints systematically. In this research we developed a novel and practical model for estimating the carbon footprint for LNG maritime transport. Using the MATLAB program an uncertainty-based carbon footprint accounting framework is created. The Monte Carlo simulation model is built to conduct a carbon footprint analysis while the main input parameters were changed within a reliable range. Later a multivariate sensitivity analysis is performed using the Risk Solver software to estimate the most significant parameters on the net carbon footprints. The sensitivity analysis results showed that that steam process day and steaming fuel consumption are found to be the most sensitive parameters for the overall carbon footprint for both Laden and Ballast trips. Furthermore it was found that the Q-Max vessel produces more carbon emissions when compared to the Q-Flex although both are traveling the same distance and are using the same fuel type. The type of fuel is also significantly affecting the emission values due to the relevant carbon content in the fuel. Like the case of the two conventional vessels the one that is running with the only LNG is found to have fewer emissions when compared to the one run with dual-mode. © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Carbon Footprint, Liquified Natural Gas Sustainability, Maritime Transport, Simulation, Ballast (railroad Track), Climate Change, Emission Control, Gas Fuel Purification, International Trade, Liquefied Natural Gas, Matlab, Monte Carlo Methods, Multivariant Analysis, Natural Gas Transportation, Risk Assessment, Risk Perception, Sensitivity Analysis, Supply Chains, Uncertainty Analysis, Waterway Transportation, Carbon Footprint Reductions, Footprint Analysis, Global Climate Changes, Liquefied Natural Gas (lng), Maritime Transport, Maritime Transportation, Sensitive Parameter, Solver Softwares, Carbon Footprint, Ballast (railroad track), Climate change, Emission control, Gas fuel purification, International trade, Liquefied natural gas, MATLAB, Monte Carlo methods, Multivariant analysis, Natural gas transportation, Risk assessment, Risk perception, Sensitivity analysis, Supply chains, Uncertainty analysis, Waterway transportation, Carbon footprint reductions, Footprint analysis, Global climate changes, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Maritime transport, Maritime transportation, Sensitive parameter, Solver softwares, Carbon footprint, Maritime Transport, Carbon Footprint, Liquified Natural Gas, Sustainability, Simulation, Maritime transport, Sustainability, Liquified Natural Gas, Carbon footprint, Simulation, Liquified Natural Gas, Sustainability

Fields of Science

0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
27

Source

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Volume

27

Issue

Start Page

1602

End Page

1613
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 26

Scopus : 29

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 89

SCOPUS™ Citations

30

checked on Apr 09, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

25

checked on Apr 09, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
2.0063

Sustainable Development Goals

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
CLIMATE ACTION13
CLIMATE ACTION
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS