Sustainable disassembly line balancing model based on triple bottom line
Loading...

Date
2020
Authors
Yigit Kazancoglu
Yeşim Deniz Özkan-Özen
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Ltd. michael.wagreich@univie.ac.at
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
End of life (EOL) phase of a product is receiving more attention due to increase in environmental concerns and many studies have been conducted for value creation in EOL focusing on concepts as remanufacturing reuse and recycling in sustainable production manner. This study especially focuses on one of global problem e-waste. To minimise the amount of wastes and maximise recovered materials from EOL disassembly is one of the most important concept associated with reuse and balancing disassembly line in an optimal way is essential for organisations. In disassembly line balancing (DLB) not only precedence of tasks but also risk criteria related to environment and human safety should be considered for sustainability. The aim of this study is to propose a model based on triple bottom line (TBL) dimensions i.e. human safety environmental safety and business criteria. To achieve sustainability in DLB and for risk assessment in sustainable DLB it had been decided to use a multi-criteria method i.e. TODIM acronym in Portuguese of ‘Tomada de Decisão Iterativa Multicritério’. The proposed model included 22 disassembly criteria categorised under TBL dimensions which are derived from the literature. Implementation of the study was conducted for computer disassembly processes and as a result of the study approximately 12% an improvement in cycle time was succeeded. In the long run the integration of sustainability in disassembly operations may contribute to the competitive advantage of the company in terms of differentiation and corporate image by achieving business environment and human targets simultaneously. © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Risk Assessment, Sustainable Disassembly Line Balancing, Todim, Triple Bottom Line, Competition, Electronic Waste, Risk Assessment, Safety Engineering, Competitive Advantage, Disassembly Line Balancing, Disassembly Operations, Environmental Concerns, Multi-criteria Method, Sustainable Production, Todim, Triple Bottom Line, Sustainable Development, Competition, Electronic Waste, Risk assessment, Safety engineering, Competitive advantage, Disassembly line balancing, Disassembly operations, Environmental concerns, Multi-criteria method, Sustainable production, TODIM, Triple Bottom Line, Sustainable development
Fields of Science
0209 industrial biotechnology, 0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
31
Source
International Journal of Production Research
Volume
58
Issue
Start Page
4246
End Page
4266
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 4
Scopus : 31
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 109
Google Scholar™






