Pipe failure rate prediction in water distribution networks using multivariate adaptive regression splines and random forest techniques
Loading...

Date
2019
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Ltd. michael.wagreich@univie.ac.at
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a comparison between multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and random forest (RF) techniques in pipe failure prediction in two water distribution networks. In this regard pipe diameter pipe length pipe installation depth pipe age and average hydraulic pressure are considered as input variables. Results show that the RF outperforms the MARS which is found as an accurate pipe failure rate predictor. The proposed models are further evaluated through dividing the data into three parts of lower medium and higher pipe failure rate values. According to the equations produced by MARS technique three variables of pipe diameter pipe age and average hydraulic pressure are distinguished as the most effective variables in predicting pipe failure rate in the first case study. Four variables of pipe diameter pipe length pipe age and average hydraulic pressure are determined as the most effective variables in the second case study. © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines, Pipe Failure Rate, Prediction Model, Random Forest, Water Distribution Network, Failure Analysis, Hydraulic Structure, Multivariate Analysis, Pipeline, Prediction, Pressure, Water Supply, failure analysis, hydraulic structure, multivariate analysis, pipeline, prediction, pressure, water supply, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines, Prediction Model, Random Forest, Water Distribution Network, Pipe Failure Rate
Fields of Science
0207 environmental engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
38
Source
Urban Water Journal
Volume
16
Issue
9
Start Page
653
End Page
661
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 4
Scopus : 43
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 49
SCOPUS™ Citations
44
checked on Apr 09, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
38
checked on Apr 09, 2026
Google Scholar™


