Müşteri Odaklı Et Tedarik Zincirlerinde Başarı Kriterlerinin Değerlendirilmesi
| dc.contributor.author | Aylin Caliskan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Caliskan, Aylin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-22T16:05:42Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Gıda üreticileri ve perakendecileri rekabet yoğun modern pazarda rekabet avantajıelde edebilmek ve faaliyetlerini sürdürebilmek için müşteri odaklı olmaya daha fazla özen göstermek durumundadırlar. Tüketicilerin tercih ve algılarının farkında olabilmek benimseyebilmek ve gerekli şekilde yönetebilmek, pazar paylarını iyileştirmek ve gereksiz tedarik zinciri operasyonlarından kaçınabilmek adına faydalıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı et tedarik zinciri yönetiminde müşteri odaklı olabilmek adına belirlenen başarılıkriterlerinin hiyerarşik yapısını ortaya koymak ve bu kriterleri etkileme ve etkilenme kuvvetlerine göre sınıflandırmaktır. Bu amaca yönelik literatür araştırmasıyla müşterilerin et satın alma davranışına etki eden kriterlertedarik zinciri yönetimiyle ilgili olacak şekilde derlenmiştir. Daha sonra bu kriterlerarasındaki ilişkiler Yorumlayıcı Yapısal Modelleme ve MICMAC analizi ile incelenmiştir. Analizler sonucunda karmaşık ilişkilere sahip olan kriterlerarasında hiyerarşik bir model geliştirilmiş ve bağımlı/bağımsız kriterlerbelirlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre ambalaj ve izlenebilirlik kriterlerinin diğer kriterleri en yüksek etkileme gücüne ve diğer kriterlerden en az etkilenme seviyesine sahip kriterler olduğu tespit edilmiştir. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ahmad M. Tang X. W. Qiu J. N. & Ahmad F. (2019). Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis for Identifying and Benchmarking Significant Factors of Seismic Soil Liquefaction.Applied Sciences9(2) 233.Attri R. Dev N. & Sharma V. (2013). Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: an overview.Research Journal of Management Sciences2319 1171.Aung M. M. & Chang Y. S. (2014). Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives.Food control39 172-184.Banović M. Grunert K. G. Barreira M. M. & Fontes M. A. (2009). Beef quality perception at the point of purchase: A study from Portugal.Food Quality and Preference20(4) 335-342.Birdir K. & Hiçyakmazer C. T. (2019). Otel İşletmelerinde KırmızıEt Satın Alma ve Tedarik Sürecinin İncelenmesi.Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies1142 1158.Chidambaranathan S. Muralidharan C. & Deshmukh S. G. (2009). Analyzing the interaction of critical factors of supplier development using Interpretive Structural Modeling—an empirical study.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology43(11-12) 1081-1093.Dobrucka R. (2013). The future of active and intelligent packaging industry. Logforum 9 (2): 103-110. http://www.logforum.net/pdf/9_2_4_13. pdf (Erişim tarihi: 15.08.2018).du Plessis H. J. & Gerrie E. (2012). The significance of traceability in consumer decision making towards Karoo lamb.Food Research International47(2) 210-217.Dubey R. & Ali S. S. (2014). Identification of flexible manufacturing system dimensions and their interrelationship using total interpretive structural modelling and fuzzy MICMAC analysis.Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management15(2) 131-143.Et ve Süt Kurumu (2020). Et. https://www.esk.gov.tr/tr/10998/ETErişim tarihi: 09.03.2020Font-i-Furnols M. & Guerrero L. (2014). Consumer preference behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview.Meat science98(3) 361-371.Geesink G. Robertson J. & Ball A. (2015). The effect of retail packaging method on objective and consumer assessment of beef quality traits.Meat science104 85-89.Gracia A. & de-Magistris T. (2013).Preferences for lamb meat: A choice experiment for Spanish consumers.Meat science95(2) 396-402.Griffiths J. James R. & Kempson J. (2000). Focusing customer demand through manufacturing supply chains by the use of customer focused cells: An appraisal.International Journal of Production Economics65(1) 111-120.Grunert K. G. Bredahl L. & Brunsø K. (2004). Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector—a review.Meat science66(2) 259-272.Hobbs J. E. (2016). Effective Use of Food Traceability in Meat Supply Chains. InAdvances in Food Traceability Techniques and Technologies(pp. 321-335). Woodhead Publishing.Jayant A. Azhar M. & Singh P. (2015). Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach: a state of the art literature review.International Journal of Research in Mechanical Engineering and Technology5(1) 15-21.Jharkharia S. & Shankar R. (2005). IT‐enablement of supply chains: understanding the barriers.Journal of Enterprise Information Management.Killinger K. M. Calkins C. R. Umberger W. J. Feuz D. M. & Eskridge K. M. (2004). Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness but differing in marbling level.Journal of Animal Science82(11) 3294-3301.Lee J. Y. Han D. B. Nayga Jr R. M. & Lim S. S. (2011). Valuing traceability of imported beef in Korea: an experimental auction approach.Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics55(3) 360-373.Liu F. Lei Y. Zhang W. Sha K. Li H. Zhang Z. ... & Sun B. (2014). Effect of different packing on quality changes of hot boning beef during storage.Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology (Beijing)16(4) 102-108.Ljungberg D. Gebresenbet G. & Aradom S. (2007). Logistics chain of animal transport and abattoir operations.Biosystems Engineering96(2) 267-277.Maltin C. Balcerzak D. Tilley R. & Delday M. (2003). Determinants of meat quality: tenderness.Proceedings of the Nutrition Society62(2) 337-347.Mancini R. A. & Hunt M. (2005). Current research in meat color.Meat science71(1) 100-121.Marian L. Chrysochou P. Krystallis A. & Thøgersen J. (2014). The role of price as a product attribute in the organic food context: An exploration based on actual purchase data.Food Quality and Preference37 52-60.Merlino V. M. Borra D. Girgenti V. Dal Vecchio A. & Massaglia S. (2018). Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes.Meat science143 119-128.Miranda-De La Lama G. C. Villarroel M. Olleta J. L. Alierta S. Sañudo C. & Maria G. A. (2009). Effect of the pre-slaughter logistic chain on meat quality of lambs.Meat Science83(4)604-609.Mohebalizadehgashti F. Zolfagharinia H. & Amin S. H. (2020). Designing a green meat supply chain network: A multi-objective approach.International Journal of Production Economics219 312-327.Pizzuti T. Mirabelli G. Grasso G. & Paldino G. (2017). MESCO (MEat Supply Chain Ontology): An ontology for supporting traceability in the meat supply chain.Food Control72 123-133.Schnettler B. Vidal R. Silva R. Vallejos L. & Sepúlveda N. (2009). Consumer willingness to pay for beef meat in a developing country: The effect of information regarding country of origin price and animal handling prior to slaughter.Food Quality and Preference20(2) 156-165.Sharma V. K. Chandna P. & Bhardwaj A. (2017). Green supply chain management related performance indicators in agro industry: A review.Journal of Cleaner Production141 1194-1208.Singh R. K. Garg S. K. & Deshmukh S. G. (2007). Interpretive structural modelling of factors for improving competitiveness of SMEs.International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management2(4) 423-440.Skandamis P. N. & Nychas G. J. E. (2002). Preservation of fresh meat with active and modified atmosphere packaging conditions.International journal of food microbiology79(1-2) 35-45.Taoukis P. & Tsironi T. (2016). Smart packaging for monitoring and managing food and beverage shelf life. InThe stability and shelf life of food(pp. 141-168). Woodhead Publishing.Troy D. J. & Kerry J. P. (2010). Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry.Meat science86(1) 214-226.Van Wezemael L. Caputo V. Nayga Jr R. M. Chryssochoidis G. & Verbeke W. (2014). European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims: A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments.Food Policy44 167-176.Wen-li L. Humphreys P. Chan L. Y. & Kumaraswamy M. (2003). Predicting purchasing performance: the role of supplier development programs.Journal of materials processing technology138(1-3) 243-249.Yamoah F. A. & Yawson D. E. (2014). Assessing supermarket food shopper reaction to horsemeat scandal in the UK.International Review of Management and Marketing4(2) 98-107. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.18026/cbayarsos.726964 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1304-4796 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2146-2844 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/10736 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/419023 | |
| dc.language.iso | Türkçe | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.source | Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi | |
| dc.subject | İşletme | |
| dc.title | Müşteri Odaklı Et Tedarik Zincirlerinde Başarı Kriterlerinin Değerlendirilmesi | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0002-2658-2761 | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Caliskan, Aylin | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C5 | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.department | ||
| gdc.description.departmenttemp | [Caliskan, Aylin] Yaşar Üniversitesi, İzmir, Türkiye | |
| gdc.description.endpage | 438 | |
| gdc.description.issue | Cumhuriyet Armağan Sayısı | |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 425 | |
| gdc.description.volume | 18 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W3095839426 | |
| gdc.identifier.trdizinid | 419023 | |
| gdc.index.type | TR-Dizin | |
| gdc.oaire.accesstype | GOLD | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 2.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 2.4526774E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | false | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 2.7298899E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | National | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 0.3373 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.65 | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 2 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 2 | |
| gdc.virtual.author | Çalişkan, Aylin | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 438 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 425 | |
| publicationissue.issueNumber | Cumhuriyet Armağan Sayısı | |
| publicationvolume.volumeNumber | 18 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | d3b025b7-311b-4533-8e48-bc96aade8f77 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | d3b025b7-311b-4533-8e48-bc96aade8f77 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 |