Economic impact assessment of Turkey's post-Kyoto vision on emission trading
Loading...

Date
2013
Authors
Gökçe Akın-Olçum
A. Erinç YELDAN
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
2
OpenAIRE Views
2
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
For the post-Kyoto period Turkey strongly emphasizes the establishment of national emission trading system by 2015 and its integration with the EU ETS along its accession process to the EU. In this paper we study the mechanisms of adjustment and economic welfare consequences of various ETS regimes that Turkey considers to apply by 2020 i.e. regional ETS and international trading within the EU ETS. We conduct our analysis under the current EU 20-20-20 emission target 20% and also under its revised version 30%. We find that Turkey has economic gains from linking with the EU ETS under the 20% cap in comparison to the domestic ETSs. Despite the EU's welfare loss under linkage in comparison to the case where Turkey has domestic abatement efforts it still prefers linking as it increases economic well being compared to the case where Turkey does not abate. Under 30% cutback Turkey has critical output loss under linkage due to high abatement burden on the EU while the EU is better off as it passes some of its abatement burden to Turkey. Therefore emission quotas and their allocation across the ETS and non ETS sectors become highly critical in distributing the overall economic gains from bilateral trading. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Applied General Equilibrium Modeling, Climate Mitigation Policies, Emission Trading Systems, Bilateral Trading, Climate Mitigations, Economic Impacts, Economic Welfare, Emission Targets, Emission Trading, Emission Trading Systems, General Equilibrium, Cost Accounting, Gas Emissions, Commerce, Assessment Method, Economic Impact, Emissions Trading, Environmental Policy, European Union, General Equilibrium Analysis, Kyoto Protocol, Mitigation, Turkey, Bilateral trading, Climate mitigations, Economic impacts, Economic welfare, Emission targets, Emission trading, Emission trading systems, General equilibrium, Cost accounting, Gas emissions, Commerce, assessment method, economic impact, emissions trading, environmental policy, European Union, general equilibrium analysis, Kyoto Protocol, mitigation, Turkey, economic impact, emissions trading, Turkey, Economic impacts, Economic welfare, mitigation, environmental policy, Emission trading systems, European Union, Gas emissions, Climate mitigation policies, Emission targets, general equilibrium analysis, Commerce, Bilateral trading, Cost accounting, Kyoto Protocol, General equilibrium, assessment method, Emission trading, Applied general equilibrium modeling, Climate mitigations
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
12
Source
Energy Policy
Volume
60
Issue
Start Page
764
End Page
774
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 6
Scopus : 12
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 45
Google Scholar™


