REKABET EDEN KURUMSAL MANTIKLAR VE ÖRGÜTLERİN KURUMSAL SOSYAL SORUMLULUKLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE PAYDAŞ ETKİLERİ
Loading...
Date
2022
Authors
GIZEM ARAS BEGER
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
BIP! Indicators
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average
Abstract
Örgütler birbirinden farklı kurumsal düzenleri gerektiren çoklu mantıkların mevcut olduğu bir alanda faaliyetlerini gerçekleştirmekte ve bunları örgütsel uygulama- süreç ve çıktılarına yansıtmaktadırlar. Ancak bu mantık çokluğu birbiri ile çelişebilen talepleri sebebi ile farklı örgütsel reçeteler sunmaktadır. Örgütsel sonuçlar üzerinde önemli etkileri göz önüne alındığında bu mantıkların örgütlerde nasıl tezahür ettiği kritik önem taşımaktadır. Literatürde özellikle bu tarz etkilerin karmaşıklık düzeyi yüksek ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk (KSS) dinamiklerinin henüz tam olarak keşfedilemediği gelişmekte olan ülkelerde daha belirgin olduğu belirtilmektedir. Bu sebeple çalışmanın amacı örgütlerin çeşitli kurumsal mantıkların etkisi altında ne tür KSS yönelimlerini hangi yollarla geliştirdiklerini keşfetmektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda geliştirilen KSS tipolojisine dayalı bir araştırma modeli oluşturulmuştur. Modeli test etmek için gerçekleştirilen anket çalışması sonuçlarına göre, ticari mantığın daha çok şirketsel fayda sosyal mantığın daha çok toplumsal faydaya götürdüğü ortaya konmuştur. Ancak her iki mantığın birlikte var olması durumuna ilişkin paydaşların zıt kutuplar arasında aracılık ederek örgütlerin birleşik faydalar yani hem şirketsel hem de toplumsal faydalar sağlayabilmelerini mümkün kıldığı tespit edilmiştir.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Etik-İşletme-Sosyoloji, İşletme, Sosyoloji, Etik, Kurumsal Mantıklar;Paydaşlar;Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk, Institutional Logics;Stakeholders;Corporate Social Responsibility
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences
Citation
Airike P. E. Rotter J. P. & Mark-Herbert C. (2016). Corporate motives for multi- stakeholder collaboration–corporate social responsibility in the electronics supply chains. Journal of cleaner production 131 639-648.Alford R. R. & Friedland R. (1985). Powers of theory: Capitalism the state and democracy. Cambridge University Press.Angus-Leppan T. Metcalf L. & Benn S. (2010). Leadership styles and CSR practice: An examination of sensemaking institutional drivers and CSR leadership. Journal of Business Ethics 93(2) 189-213.Ararat M. (2004). Social responsibility in a state dependent system. In A. Habisch J. Jonker M. Wegner & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.) Corporate social responsibility across Europe (pp. 247–261). Berlin: Springer.Arena M. Azzone G. & Mapelli F. (2018). What drives the evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility strategies? An institutional logics perspective. Journal of cleaner production 171 345-355.Badulescu A. Badulescu D. Saveanu T. & Hatos R. (2018). The relationship between firm size and age and its social responsibility actions—Focus on a developing country (Romania). Sustainability 10(3) 805.Basu K. & Palazzo G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review 33(1) 122-136.Basu K. & Palazzo G. (2005). An inductive typology for corporate social responsibility. In Academy of Management Proceedings (No. 1 pp. C1- C6). Briarcliff Manor NY 10510: Academy of Management.Battilana J. Besharov M. & Mitzinneck B. (2017). On hybrids and hybrid organizing: A review and roadmap for future research. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism 2 133-169.Baumann-Pauly D. Scherer A. G. & Palazzo G. (2016). Managing institutional complexity: A longitudinal study of legitimacy strategies at a sportswear brand company. Journal of Business Ethics 137(1) 31-51.Besharov Marya L. & Smith Wenfy K. (2014). Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implicatıons. Academy of Management Review 39(3) 364-381.Bocquet R. & Mothe C. (2011). Exploring the relationship between CSR and innovation: A comparison between small and largesized French companies. Revue Sciences de Gestion (80) 101-119.Carrigan M. McEachern M. Moraes C. & Bosangit C. (2017). The fine jewellery industry: Corporate responsibility challenges and institutional forces facing SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics 143(4) 681-699.Christiansen L. H. & Lounsbury M. (2013). Strange brew: Bridging logics via institutional bricolage and the reconstitution of organizational identity. In Institutional logics in action part B. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Czarniawska B. (1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Fairclough S. & Micelotta E. R. (2013). Beyond the family firm: Reasserting the influence of the family institutional logic across organizations. In Institutional logics in action part B. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Fornell. C. and Larcker. D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 39-50.Glynn M. A. & Raffaelli R. (2013). Logic pluralism organizational design and practice adoption: The structural embeddedness of CSR programs. In Institutional Logics in Action Part B. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Golob U. Turkel S. Kronegger L. & Uzunoglu E. (2018). Uncovering CSR meaning networks: A cross-national comparison of Turkey and Slovenia. Public relations review 44(4) 433-443.Govindan K. Kannan D. & Shankar K. M. (2014). Evaluating the drivers of corporate social responsibility in the mining industry with multi-criteria approach: A multi-stakeholder perspective. Journal of cleaner production 84 214-232.Graafland J. & Van de Ven B. (2006). Strategic and moral motivation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship (22) 111- 123.Greenwood R. Raynard M. Kodeih F. Micelotta E. R. & Lounsbury M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals 5 317–371.Greenwood R. Díaz A. M. Li S. X. & Lorente J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization science 21(2) 521-539.Hair Jr. J. F.. Hult. G. T. M.. Ringle. C.. & Sarstedt. M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.Hair. J.F. Black. W.C. Babin. B.J. and Anderson. R.E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. Seventh Edition Essex: Pearson.Hemingway C. A. & Maclagan P. W. (2004). Managers' personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics 50(1) 33-44.Hovring C. M. Andersen S. E. & Nielsen A. E. (2018). Discursive tensions in CSR multi-stakeholder dialogue: A Foucauldian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 152(3) 627-645.Hovring C. M. (2017). Caught in a communicative catch 22? Translating the notion of CSR as shared value creation in a Danish CSR frontrunner. Business Ethics: A European Review 26(4) 369-381.Jamali D. Jain T. Samara G. & Zoghbi E. (2020). How institutions affect CSR practices in the Middle East and North Africa: A critical review. Journal of World Business 55(5) 101127.Jamali D. & Karam C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews 20(1) 32-61.Jamali D. Karam C. Yin J. and Soundararajan V. (2017). Csr Logics in Developing Countries: Translation Adaptation and Stalled Development. Journal of World Business 52(3) 343-359.Jamali D. Lund-Thomsen P. & Jeppesen S. (2017a). SMEs and CSR in developing countries. Business & Society 56(1) 11-22.Jamali D. & Karam C. (2016). CSR in developed versus developing countries: A comparative glimpse. In Örtenblad A (Ed.) Research handbook on corporate social responsibility in context. Elgar: Cheltenham UK.Jamali D. & Neville B. (2011). Convergence versus divergence of CSR in developing countries: An embedded multi-layered institutional lens. Journal of Business Ethics 102(4) 599-621.Jamali D. Zanhour M. & Keshishian T. (2009). Peculiar strengths and relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR. Journal of business Ethics 87(3) 355-377.Jamali D. Safieddine A. M. & Rabbath M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review 16(5) 443-459.Jenkins H. (2004). A critique of conventional CSR theory: An SME perspective. Journal of General Management 29(4) 37-57.Kang N. & Moon J. (2012). Institutional complementarity between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: A comparative institutional analysis of three capitalisms. Socio-Economic Review 10(1) 85-108.Karam C. M. & Jamali D. (2017). A cross-cultural and feminist perspective on CSR in developing countries: Uncovering latent power dynamics. Journal of Business Ethics 142(3) 461-477.Levänen J. Lindeman S. Halme M. Tervo M. & Lyytinen T. (2022). Bridging divergent institutional logics through intermediation practices: Insights from a developing country context. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 176 121443.Looser S. U. (2019). Intrinsic and extrinsic corporate social responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Looser S. & Wehrmeyer W. (2015). Stakeholder mapping of CSR in Switzerland. Social Responsibility Journal 11(4) 780-830.Montabon F. Pagell M. & Wu Z. (2016). Making sustainability sustainable. Journal of Supply Chain Management 52(2) 11-27.Morgan G. Hirsch P. & Quack S. (2015). Elites on trial: introduction. In Elites on Trial. United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Morsing M. & Perrini F. (2009). CSR in SMEs: do SMEs matter for the CSR agenda? Business Ethics: A European Review 18(1) 1-6.Morsing M. & Spence L. J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication and small and medium sized enterprises: The governmentality dilemma of explicit and implicit CSR communication. Human Relations 72(12) 1920-1947.Mullins D. Czischke D. & van Bortel G. (2012). Exploring the meaning of hybridity and social enterprise in housing organisations. Housing Studies 27(4) 405–417.Pache A. & Santos F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal 56 972-1001.Perrini F. (2006). SMEs and CSR theory: Evidence and implications from an Italian perspective. Journal of business ethics 67(3) 305-316.Pfeffer J. (2005). Changing mental models: HR's most important task. Human Resources Management 44(2) 123-128.Rodriguez Bolivar M. P. Garde Sanchez R. & Lopez Hernandez A. M. (2015). Managers as drivers of CSR in state-owned enterprises. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58(5) 777-801.Schaltegger S. & Hörisch J. (2017). In search of the dominant rationale in sustainability management: legitimacy-or profit-seeking?. Journal of Business Ethics 145(2) 259-276.Schaltegger S. & Wagner M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions. Business strategy and the environment 20(4) 222-237.Schneider A. (2015). Reflexivity in sustainability accounting and management: Transcending the economic focus of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 127(3) 525-536.Smith W. K. Besharov M. L. Wessels A. K. & Chertok M. (2012). A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges leadership skills and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(3) 463-478.Tanimoto K. (2019). Do multi-stakeholder initiatives make for better CSR?. Corporate Governance. The International Journal of Business in Society 19(4) 704-716.Thornton P. H. Ocasio W. & Lounsbury M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture structure and process. Oxford University Press on Demand.Türker D. (2015). An analysis of corporate social responsibility in the Turkish business context. In Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe (pp. 483- 499). Cham Springer.Vallaster C. Kraus S. Kailer N. & Baldwin B. (2019). Responsible entrepreneurship: Outlining the contingencies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 25(3) 538-553.Vallentin S. and Morsing M. (2008). Social responsibility in Danish SMEs: mapping the territory. In Morsing M. Vallentin S. and Hildebrandt S. (Eds.) CSR in SMEs (pp. 8-36). Copenhagen: Børsen Forlag.Visser W. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries. In A. Crane A. McWilliams D. Matten J. Moon and D. Siegel (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 473-503). Oxford University Press.Yamak S. Ergur A. Karatas Ozkan M. & Tatli A. (2019). CSR and leadership approaches and practices: a comparative inquiry of owners and professional executives. European Management Review 16(4) 1097-1114.Zhao E. Y. & Lounsbury M. (2016). An institutional logics approach to social entrepreneurship: Market logic religious diversity and resource acquisition by microfinance organizations. Journal of Business Venturing 31(6) 643- 662.
WoS Q
Scopus Q
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi
Volume
Issue
Özel Sayı
Start Page
72
End Page
99
Collections
Google Scholar™
