POSTKOLONYAL KURAM ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER DİSİPLİNİNİDEKOLONİZE ETMEK
Loading...
Date
2013
Authors
Elem TEPECİKLİOĞLU EYRİCE
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Abstract
Postkolonyal kuram Uluslararası İlişkiler (Uİ) disiplininde uzun yıllar hâkim olmuş rasyonalist/pozitivistgeleneğin temel savlarına eleştirel bir bakış açısıyla karşı çıkma iddiasında bulunan ve sahip olduğuyöntembilimsel (metodolojik)/epistemolojik duruşa bağlı olarakpostpozitivist/reflektivist/yorumsamacı/yapısal olarak nitelendirilebilecek ana akım olmayan birUluslararası İlişkiler kuramıdır. Bu makale postkolonyal kuramı Uluslararası İlişkiler disiplininin tarihi akışıiçindeki gelişimini göz önünde bulundurarak, kökleri verdiği temel eserler ve mevcut Uluslararası İlişkilerkuramlarına getirdiği eleştiriler çerçevesinde değerlendirmeyi ve böylelikle post kolonyal kurama aityazının ve Türkçe terminolojinin daha iyi bir şekilde anlaşılmasını sağlamayı amaçlamıştır. Makale gelişimidevam eden postkolonyal kuramın ana akım Uluslararası İlişkiler kuramlarına yönelik güçlü bir eleştirelbakış açısı sunmakta olduğunu iddia etmektedir (1)
Description
Keywords
Uluslararası İlişkiler
Fields of Science
Citation
Acharya A.(2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization 58(2):239-275. Acharya A. ve Buzan B (2007). Why There is no non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pasific 7(3): 287-312 Adler E.(19979. Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations. 3(3): 319-363 Agathangelou A.M. ve Ling L.H.M. (2009). Transforming World Politics: From Empire to Multiple Worlds. Routledge. Ahluwalia P.(2001). Politics and Post-Colonial Theory: African Inflections Routledge: London and New York. Anghie A.(2006). Decolonizing the Concept of Good Governance (ss.109-130). Branwen Gruffydd Jones (der) Decolonizing International Relations Lanham Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. Ashcroft B. ve diğerleri. (1998). Key Concepts in Post-Colonial Studies London and New York: Routledge. Ashcroft B. ve diğerleri. (2002). The Empire Writes Back London and New York: Routledge. Ashcroft B. ve diğerleri. (2003). The Post-Colonial Studies Reader USA and Canada: Routledge. Bhabba H.K. (1996). The Other Question: Difference Discrimination and the Discourse of Colonialism (ss. 87-106). Houston A. Baker Manthia Diawara ve Ruth H. Lindeborg (der.) Black British Cultural Studies: a Reader. Chicago: University of Chicago 1996. Bhabba H.K.(1996). Unpacking my Library Again. (ss. 199-211). Iain Chambers ve Lidia 1996 Curti (der.) The Post- Colonial Question: Common Skies Divided Horizons. London and New York: Routledge. Bhabba H.K. (1994). The Location of Culture London and New York: Routledge. Bianca I. (2008). Contested Nationalities and Postcolonial IR theory: The Aprés Coup as an Approach to Historical Injustice. 26 Mart 2008 Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA s 49th Annual Convention Bridging Multiple Divides Hilton San Francisco USA _____http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p252044_index.html> (Erişim Tarihi: 10 Kasım 2009). Bilgin P.(2008). Thinking past Western IR? Third World Quarterly 29(1): 5-23. Booth K. (1995). Human Wrongs and International Relations. International Affairs. 71(1):103-126 Carby H.V (1996). White Women Listen! Black Feminism and the Boundaries of Sisterhood. (ss. 61-86). Houston A. Baker Manthia Diawara ve Ruth H. Lindeborg (der.) Black British Cultural Studies: a Reader Chicago: University of Chicago. Césaire A. (1972). Discourse on Colonialism çev. Joan Pinkham London and New York: Monthly Review Press. Chakrabarty D. (1992). Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for Indian Pasts?. Representations 37:1- 26. Chakrabarty D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference Princeton: Princeton University Press. Checkel J.T. (1998). The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. Reviews: National Interests in International Society by Martha Finnemore, The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics by Peter Katzenstein, Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid by Audie Klotz World Politics 50(2): 324-334. Ching-Chang C. (2011) The absence of non-western IR theory in Asia reconsidered. International Relations of the Asia- Pacific. 11(1):1-23 Dunn K.C. (2001). Introduction: Africa and International Relations Theory. (ss. 1-8). Kevin C. Dunn ve Timothy M. Shaw (der.) Africa s Challenge to International Relations Theory Palgrave. Fanon F. (2008). Black Skin White Masks Pluto Press Fanon F. (1963). The Wretched of the Earth New York Grove Press Grovogui S.N. (2001). Sovereignty in Africa: Quasi-Statehood and Other Myths in International Theory. (ss. 29-45). Kevin C. Dunn ve Timothy M. Shaw (der.) Africa s Challenge to International Relations Theory Houdmills Basingstoke Hampshire: Palgrave. Halperin S. (2006). International Relations Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Modernity. (ss. 43-63). Branwen Gruffydd Jones (der.) Decolonizing International Relations Lanham Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. Haluani M. (2006). How? International? are Theories in International Relations?: The View from Latin America. 22 Mart 2006 Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association Town & Country Resort and Convention Center San Diego California USA _____http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p100589_index.html> (Erişim Tarihi: 16 Nisan 2011). Hart J. ve Goldie T. (1993). Post-Colonial Theory. (ss. 155-158). Irene Rima Makaryk (der.) Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory: Approaches Scholars Terms Toronto: University of Toronto Press HoffmannS.(1977). An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus 106(3): 41-60 Holsti K.J. (1996). The State War and the State of War Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Huddart D. (2006). Homi K. Bhabba London and New York: Routledge Jones B.G. (2006). Introduction: International Relations Eurocentrism and Imperialism. (ss. 1-19). Branwen Gruffydd Jones (der.) Decolonizing International Relations Lanham Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. KoranyB.(1986). Strategic Studies and the Third World: A Critical Evaluation. International Social Science Journal 38(4): 547 562. Krishna S.(1993). The Importance of Being Ironic: A Postcolonial View on Critical International Relations Theory. Alternatives: Global Local Political. 18(3): 385-417. KrishnaS (2006). Race Amnesia and the Education of International Relations. (ss. 89-108). Branwen Gruffydd Jones (der.) Decolonizing International Relations Lanham Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. Malaquias A. (2001) Reformulating International Relations Theory: African Insights and Challenges. (ss. 11-28). Kevin C. Dunn ve Timothy M. Shaw (der.) Africa s Challenge to International Relations Theory Houdmills Basingstoke Hampshire: Palgrave Mearsheimer J.(1995) The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19(3): 5-49. Memmi A. (2006). Decolonization and the Decolonized çev. Robert Bononno Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press Memmi A. (2003). The Colonizer and the Colonized UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd Mgonja B.E.S. ve Makombe I.A.M. (2009). Debating international relations and its relevance to the third world. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 3(1): 27-37. Mills S. (1998). Post-colonial Feminist Theory. (ss. 98-112). Stevi Jackson ve Jackie Jones (der.) Contemporary Feminist Theories Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 1998 Moore-Gilbert B. (1997). Postcolonial Theory: Context Practices Politics London and New York: Verso Morgenthau H. (11973). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Peace and Power New York: Knopf Neuman S.G. (1998). International Relations Theory and the Third World: An Oxymoron? (ss. 1-30). Stephanie G. Neuman (der.) International Relations Theory and the Third World New York: St. Martin s Press NkiwaneT.C.(2001). The End of History? African Challenges to Liberalism in International Relations. (ss. 103-111). Kevin C. Dunn ve Timothy M. Shaw (der.) Africa s Challenge to International Relations Theory Palgrave. Rukundwa L.S. ve Van Aarde A.G. (2007). The Formation of Postcolonial Theory HTS 63(3): 1171-1194. Rumelili B. (2009). Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorisinde Yerel-Görüşlülük ve Doğu nun Özneselliği. Uluslararası İlişkiler. 6(23): 45-71. Said E.W. (1979). Orientalism New York: Vintage Books Sartre J.P. (2003). Introduction. (ss. 17-25). Albert Memmi The Colonizer and the Colonized UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd 1 Saurin J. (2006). International Relations as the Imperial Illusion, or the Need to Decolonize IR. (ss. 23-42). Branwen Gruffydd Jones (der.) Decolonizing International Relations Lanham Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. Seth S. (2011) Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations. Millenium - Journal of International Studies. 40(1): 167-183. Smedley A. (1998). Race and the Construction of Human Identity. American Anthropologis. (100)3: 694-695. Smith S. (1997). New Approaches to International Theory. (ss. 165-190). John Baylis and Steve Smith (der.) The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations New York: Oxford University Press 1997. Smith S.(2000). The discipline of international relations: still an American social science?. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2(3): 374-402. Spivak G.C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak?. Cary Nelson and Lawrance Grossberg (der.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press Spivak G.C. (1999). A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present Cambridge Massachusetts London: Harvard University Press Sudbury J. (2000). Feminism: Black British. (ss. 721-722). Kramarae ve Dale Spender (der.) Routledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women s Issues and Knowledge Cilt 2: New York Routledge ThompsonP.S (2002). Negritude and a New Africa: An Update. Research in African Literatures. 33(4): 143-153. Tickner A.(2003). Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World. Millenium Journal of International Studies 32(2): 295-324. Tiffin H. (2003). Post-colonial Literatures and Counter-discourse. (ss.95-98). The Post-Colonial Studies Reader USA and Canada: Routledge Vasquez J. A. (1998) The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Waever O. (1998). The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations. International Organization. 52(4): 687-727. Waltz K. (1979). Theory of International Politics London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Wendt A. (1995). Constructing International Politics. International Security. 20(1): 71-81. Wendt A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Young R.J.C. (1995). Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory Culture and Race London and New York: Routledge Young R.J.C. (2003): Postcolonialism: A Very Short Introduction Oxford: Oxford University Press. Young R.J.C. (2004). White Mythologies London and New York: Routledge
WoS Q
Scopus Q
Source
Ege Strateji̇k Araştirmalar Dergi̇si̇
Volume
4
Issue
2
Start Page
80
End Page
97
Collections
